Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA) - Appeal Determined (HCA)

Pico Holdings Inc v Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd[2002] QSC 86

Pico Holdings Inc v Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd[2002] QSC 86

CITATION: Pico Holdings Inc v Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd [2002] QSC 86
JUDGE(S): Helman J
DELIVERED ON: 26 March 2002
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Pico Holdings Inc v Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Pico Holdings Inc v Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd

  • MNC:

    [2002] QSC 86

  • Court:

    QSC

  • Judge(s):

    Helman J

  • Date:

    26 Mar 2002

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary Judgment[2002] QSC 8626 Mar 2002Applicant sought declarations that it held equitable charge over first respondent's property in priority to second respondent's mortgage; where first respondent's director also director of another company; whether charge granted on behalf of first respondent; application dismissed: Helman J
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2003] QCA 20423 May 2003Applicant appealed against [2002] QSC 86; where first respondent's ownership of charged land not disclosed to applicant; trial judge's finding open on the evidence; appeal dismissed: M McMurdo P, Jerrard JA and Mullins J
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2003] QCA 48906 Nov 2003Applicant applied for stay of costs orders in [2002] QSC 86 and [2003] QCA 204 pending application for special leave to appeal to the High Court; where prospects of success poor and limited prejudice to applicant; application for stay of execution dismissed with costs: Davies JA
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2006] QCA 51001 Dec 2006Matter remitted per [2005] HCA 13; timetabling directions made: M McMurdo P
Special Leave Granted (HCA)[2004] HCATrans 38208 Oct 2004Applicant applied for special leave to appeal against [2003] QCA 204; whether necessary to clarify principle in Taylor v Johnson in cases of mistake; special leave to appeal granted: McHugh, Gummow and Callinan JJ
HCA Judgment[2005] HCA 13; (2005) 214 ALR 392; (2005) 79 ALJR 825; (2005) Aust Contract R 90-209; (2005) Q ConvR 54-62105 Apr 2005Applicant appealed against [2003] QCA 204; whether reasonable person would have understood director as acting on behalf of first respondent; appeal allowed with costs, orders in [2002] QSC 86 set aside and matter remitted to Court of Appeal to determine issue of priority with second defendant's mortgage: Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Heydon JJ

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA) - Appeal Determined (HCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.