Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA) - Appeal Determined (HCA)

Orr v State of Queensland[2003] QSC 463

Orr v State of Queensland[2003] QSC 463

CITATION: Orr v State of Queensland [2003] QSC 463
JUDGE(S): Douglas J
DELIVERED ON: 17 December 2003
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Jason Thomas Orr v State of Queensland

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Orr v State of Queensland

  • MNC:

    [2003] QSC 463

  • Court:

    QSC

  • Judge(s):

    Douglas J

  • Date:

    17 Dec 2003

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary Judgment[2003] QSC 46317 Dec 2003Applicants applied for leave under s 43 of Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) to commence proceedings despite non-compliance with that part of the Act; whether urgent need to start proceedings; proceedings out of time and applications dismissed: Douglas J
Primary Judgment[2004] QSC 23616 Jun 2004Applicants again applied for leave under s 43 of Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld) to commence proceedings; where new evidence adduced; leave to commence proceedings granted: Holmes J
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2004] QCA 21525 Jun 2004Applicants appealed against orders in [2003] QSC 463; whether urgent need to start proceedings; appeals dismissed: Williams and Jerrard JJA and Muir J
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2004] QCA 46103 Dec 2004State of Queensland appealed against [2004] QSC 236; whether s 43 of the Act permitted proceedings to be commenced after expiry of limitation period; appeals allowed, orders below set and applications at first instance refused: de Jersey CJ, M McMurdo P and Chesterman J
Special Leave Granted (HCA)[2005] HCATrans 45623 Jun 2005Applicants applied for special leave to appeal against [2004] QCA 461; whether s 43 of the Act required consideration of s 31 of Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld); special leave to appeal granted: Gummow and Heydon JJ
HCA Judgment (2006) 226 CLR 234 80 ALJR 946 [2006] HCA 2117 May 2006Applicants appealed against [2004] QCA 461; whether s 43 of the Act required reasonably arguable case under s 31(2) of Limitation Act; appeal allowed and orders of Court of Appeal set aside: Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon and Crennan JJ

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA) - Appeal Determined (HCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.