Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA) - Appeal Determined (HCA)

R v Collins[2017] QCA 113

Reported at [2018] 1 Qd R 364
CITATION: R v Collins [2017] QCA 113
JUDGE(S): Gotterson JA, Morrison JA, Burns J
DELIVERED ON: 02 June 2017
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v Collins

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v Collins

  • Reported Citation:

    [2018] 1 Qd R 364

  • MNC:

    [2017] QCA 113

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Gotterson JA, Morrison JA, Burns J

  • Date:

    02 Jun 2017

  • Selected for Reporting:

    Editor's Note

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentDC435/14 (No citation)30 Oct 2016Date of conviction following retrial (ordered in [2013] QCA 389) of four sexual offences concerning a single complainant. The trial was fought on the issue of consent. M was a preliminary complaint witness in respect of whom an issue as to a prior inconsistent statement arose.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2017] QCA 113 [2018] 1 Qd R 36402 Jun 2017Appeal against convictions dismissed; as M had distinctly admitted making the prior inconsistent statement and affirmed the truth of its contents, the trial judge erred in directing the jury that M’s earlier account was not evidence of the terms of the preliminary complaint; notwithstanding, the appeal should be dismissed as no substantial miscarriage of justice actually occurred (despite Crown disavowing reliance on proviso): Burns J (Gotterson and Morrison JJA agreeing).
Special Leave Granted (HCA)[2017] HCATrans 23717 Nov 2017Special leave granted: Gageler, Nettle and Gordon JJ.
HCA Transcript[2018] HCATrans 5322 Mar 2018Decision reserved: Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane, Gordon and Edelman JJ.
HCA Judgment[2018] HCA 18; (2018) 265 CLR 17809 May 2018Appeal allowed, convictions quashed, retrial ordered; Court of Appeal did not err in concluding that M had adopted earlier account and that consequently jury misdirected; as to proviso, Court of Appeal not bound by Crown concession but should have put appellant on notice that application of proviso a live issue so as to enable him to be heard on it; in this case, it could not be concluded that no substantial miscarriage of justice actually occurred: Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane, Gordon and Edelman JJ.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA) - Appeal Determined (HCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.