To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
S was convicted upon the verdict of a jury of one count of arson and one count of fraud in respect of his house. He was acquitted of one count of arson and one count of fraud in relation to his car. The Crown case on all counts depended upon the evidence of C.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2002] QCA 341 (2002) 134 A Crim R 100
06 Sep 2002
Appeal against convictions allowed, convictions quashed, verdicts of acquittal entered; the jury's guilty verdicts were inconsistent with its not guilty verdicts, there being no identifiable rational basis for the differential verdicts: Holmes J (Williams JA and Mackenzie J agreeing).
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
