Your JavaScript is currently disabled. For the best experience viewing this website please enable JavaScript as described here.

Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments

Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode

Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen version of this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please return to the case for PDF printing options.

Word Highlighter:
0of0
Change Font and Font Size
Font:
Font Size:

Notable Unreported Decision
Appeal Determined (QCA)

Add to List

Emaaas Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd[2003] QCA 232

CITATION:	Emaaas Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd [2003] QCA 232
JUDGE(S):	McPherson JA, White J, Wilson J
DELIVERED ON:	06 June 2003

Editorial Notes

Published Case Name:
Emaaas P/L v Mobil Oil Aust Ltd
Shortened Case Name:
Emaaas Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd
MNC:
[2003] QCA 232
Court:
QCA
Judge(s):
McPherson JA, White J, Wilson J
Date:
06 Jun 2003
White Star Case:
Yes

Litigation History

Event	Citation or File	Date	Notes
Primary Judgment	[2002] QSC 267 [2003] ANZ ConvR 65; (2003) Q ConvR 54-579	05 Sep 2002	Plaintiff sought declarations that defendant's notice of termination invalid; where cl 6.1(b) of lease conferred right to terminate if access street "significantly altered"; whether alterations to street sufficient to cause "significant economic disadvantage" to defendant; declared that defendant validly terminated lease: Byrne J
Appeal Determined (QCA)	[2003] QCA 232	06 Jun 2003	Plaintiff appealed against [2002] QSC 267; whether trial judge erred in concluding that defendant sustained substantial economic disadvantage; appeal dismissed with costs: McPherson JA, White and Wilson JJ

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode

Change Font and Font Size

Emaaas Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd[2003] QCA 232

Emaaas Pty Ltd v Mobil Oil Australia Ltd[2003] QCA 232

Editorial Notes

Litigation History

Appeal Status