To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Plaintiff claimed that the defendant was obliged to contribute equally to development costs under a development agreement. Defendant contended the development agreement was not binding and that the relationship between plaintiff and defendant was that of borrower and lender. The defendant counterclaimed in respect of certain advances of money made to the plaintiff. The defendant was ordered to pay to plaintiff an amount as found due by expert . The counterclaim was dismissed: Chesterman J.
Primary Judgment
[2006] QCA 274
03 Aug 2006
Application for a stay of the operation of an order made by Mr Justice Chesterman in the trial division on 5 July 2006. Stay granted in part: McMurdo P.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2006] QCA 433
03 Nov 2006
Appeal against a judgment in favour of the respondent directing it to pay to the respondent such amount as is found due by an expert appointed for that purpose by the court. Appeal dismissed with leave as to costs: McMurdo P, Holmes JA, Cullinane J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2006] QCA 500
01 Dec 2006
Application for costs on an indemnity basis. Ordered that the appellant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal to be assessed on the standard basis: McMurdo P, Holmes JA, Cullinane J.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
