To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Trail of claim seeking return of chattel and infringing copies pursuant to Copyright Act, declarations regarding whether a deed is void, termination of the deed, entitlements under the Patents Act, and damages for fraudulent misrepresentation under the TPA, and for breach of warranty; damages claims, TPA claims, Patent Act claim dismissed, successful in recovery of chattel as modified: Muir J.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QSC 403
09 Feb 2007
Costs of trial following [2006] QSC 185; no order as to costs: Muir J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2006] QCA 570
22 Dec 2006
Appeal against TPA findings dismissed with costs; no basis for overturning the finding made by the learned trial judge that the representation was an inducing cause of the Deed; not demonstrated that the trial judge erred in concluding that Foxworth did not lawfully terminate the contract and that in consequence Polwood was entitled to the deposit: Williams JA, Helman and Philippides JJ.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
