To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Decision giving rise to AG reference; affidavits in support of the telephone intercept warrants were required by s 590AH(2)(c)(i)(A) and s 590AJ(2)(e) and (f) to be disclosed as statements of a witness in the possession of the prosecution, and statements relevant to the proceeding on indictment against each of Mr Rollason and Mr Jenkins: Helman J.
QCA Original Jurisdiction
[2007] QCA 65 [2008] 1 Qd R 85
09 Mar 2007
AG reference s 590AA on points of law regarding proper construction of ss 590AH(2)(c)(i)(A) and 590AJ(2)(e) and (f) of the Code Qld; statements of witness given in AAT in support of application for a warrant for telecommunications interception captured by provisions; a statement will be relevant to the proceeding for the purpose of s 590AJ(2)(e) and (f) if it is material which has led to the obtaining of the evidence on which the prosecution is based: Keane and Holmes JJA and Mackenzie J.
Appeal Status
No Status
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.