Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

R v Rollason & Jenkins; ex parte Attorney-General[2007] QCA 65

Reported at [2008] 1 Qd R 85

R v Rollason & Jenkins; ex parte Attorney-General[2007] QCA 65

Reported at [2008] 1 Qd R 85
CITATION: R v Rollason & Jenkins; ex parte Attorney-General [2007] QCA 65
JUDGE(S): Keane JA, Holmes JA, Mackenzie J
DELIVERED ON: 09 March 2007
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v Rollason & Jenkins; ex parte A-G (Qld)

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v Rollason & Jenkins; ex parte Attorney-General

  • Reported Citation:

    [2008] 1 Qd R 85

  • MNC:

    [2007] QCA 65

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Keane JA, Holmes JA, Mackenzie J

  • Date:

    09 Mar 2007

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentSC475/06 (No Citation)28 Nov 2006Decision giving rise to AG reference; affidavits in support of the telephone intercept warrants were required by s 590AH(2)(c)(i)(A) and s 590AJ(2)(e) and (f) to be disclosed as statements of a witness in the possession of the prosecution, and statements relevant to the proceeding on indictment against each of Mr Rollason and Mr Jenkins: Helman J.
QCA Original Jurisdiction[2007] QCA 65 [2008] 1 Qd R 8509 Mar 2007AG reference s 590AA on points of law regarding proper construction of ss 590AH(2)(c)(i)(A) and 590AJ(2)(e) and (f) of the Code Qld; statements of witness given in AAT in support of application for a warrant for telecommunications interception captured by provisions; a statement will be relevant to the proceeding for the purpose of s 590AJ(2)(e) and (f) if it is material which has led to the obtaining of the evidence on which the prosecution is based: Keane and Holmes JJA and Mackenzie J.

Appeal Status

No Status

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.