To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Reasons for judgment on application to extend time within which to appeal to P&E Court; extension granted; no prejudice to the State: White DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2004] QPEC 48
02 Aug 2004
Substantive appeal in P&E Court; dismissal appeal against decision to refuse permit; Parliament is clearly empowered to authorize planning schemes which restrict what the owners of estates in fee simple may lawfully do with their land: White DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2004] QSC 434
19 Nov 2004
Application in trial division challenging jurisdiction of P&E Court to make decision on appeal regarding rejection of approval of development permit; Parliament is clearly empowered to authorize planning schemes which restrict what the owners of estates in fee simple may lawfully do with their land: de Jersey CJ.
Appeal Discontinued (QCA)
File Number: CA7419/04
10 Mar 2005
Appeal against White DCJ decision on 2 August 2004 in P&E Court; dismissed by consent.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2006] QCA 235
23 Jun 2006
Application for extension of time to appeal [2004] QSC 434 dismissed; applicant applied for a permit to clear native vegetation but was refused because her land was described as a known habitat for the endangered mahogany glider, as well as a known general habitat for the endangered cassowary; no error in primary judge finding that it was necessary for Mrs Burns to secure a development permit to clear native vegetation on her freehold land: Jerrard JA, Cullinane and Jones JJ.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2007] QCA 240
27 Jul 2007
Application by successful respondent to the appeal State of Queensland [2006] QCA 235; sought non-party cost order against person assisting litigant in person; sufficient grounds exist to exercise discretion, but discretion not exercised: Jerrard JA, Cullinane and Jones JJ.
Special Leave Refused (HCA)
[2008] HCASL 68
28 Mar 2008
Application for special leave against decision of Court of Appeal dismissing application to extend time to appeal against de Jersey CJ decision; not raised any question of law that would justify the grant of special leave to appeal: Gummow and Kiefel JJ.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
