Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  •  Notable Unreported Decision
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

Ipswich City Council v Dixonbuild Pty Ltd[2012] QCA 98

Ipswich City Council v Dixonbuild Pty Ltd[2012] QCA 98

CITATION: Ipswich City Council v Dixonbuild Pty Ltd [2012] QCA 98
JUDGE(S): Chesterman JA, White JA, Dalton J
DELIVERED ON: 17 April 2012
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Ipswich City Council v Dixonbuild Pty Ltd

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Ipswich City Council v Dixonbuild Pty Ltd

  • MNC:

    [2012] QCA 98

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Chesterman JA, White JA, Dalton J

  • Date:

    17 Apr 2012

  • White Star Case:

    Yes

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary Judgment(No citation)13 Sep 2009Dixonbuild was convicted under s.440ZG(a)(iii) Environmental Protection Act 1994 for unlawfully depositing a “proscribed water contaminant” (identified as sand) “at another place” and in a way so that the contaminant “could reasonably be expected to wash, blow, fall or otherwise move into ... a roadside gutter”. The Magistrates Court imposed a fine of $20,000.00.
Primary Judgment[2011] QDC 18531 Aug 2011Appeal allowed. Appealed orders are set aside: Dorney QC, DCJ.
Primary Judgment[2011] QDC 20208 Sep 2011Costs orders: Dorney QC, DCJ.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2012] QCA 9817 Apr 2012The Ipswich City Council applied for leave to appeal from the decision of the District Court which was refused with costs: Chesterman JA, White JA, Dalton J.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.