Crime and Misconduct Commission v WSX & EDC (No 2)
[2013] QCA 187
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Crime and Misconduct Commission v WSX & EDC (No 2) [2013] QCA 187
JUDGE(S):
de Jersey CJ, Gotterson JA, Mullins J
DELIVERED ON:
16 July 2013
Close
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Crime and Misconduct Commission v WSX & EDC
Shortened Case Name:
Crime and Misconduct Commission v WSX & EDC (No 2)
MNC:
[2013] QCA 187
Court:
QCA
Judge(s):
de Jersey CJ, Gotterson JA, Mullins J
Date:
16 Jul 2013
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
SC7874/13 (No citation)
13 Dec 2012
WSX and EDC refused to answer questions put to them during the conduct of an investigation under the Crime and Misconduct Act 2001. The Presiding Officer conducting the investigation ruled that each of WSX and EDC did not have reasonable excuses for refusing to answer. The Court gave leave to appeal, allowed the appeals and ruled that each had a reasonable excuse.
QCA Interlocutory Judgment
[2013] QCA 187
16 Jul 2013
Costs orders in appeal not disturbed: de Jersey CJ, Gotterson JA, Mullins J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2013] QCA 152 (2013) 229 A Crim R 286
18 Jun 2013
Decision below made on 13 December 2012 set aside. The decision of the Presiding Officer affirmed: de Jersey CJ, Gotterson JA, Mullins J.
Special Leave Refused (HCA)
[2014] HCATrans 192
04 Sep 2014
Special leave refused: Hayne and Kiefel JJ.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
