Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

R v Castel[2020] QCA 91

Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading
(as on screen PDF)

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v Castel

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v Castel

  • MNC:

    [2020] QCA 91

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Sofronoff P, Mullins JA, Boddice J

  • Date:

    06 May 2020

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentSC377/19 (No citation)19 Mar 2019Date of sentence of 9 years’ imprisonment with default parole eligibility date; pleaded guilty to manslaughter (domestic violence offence); offender killed husband when she threw a knife at him in the course of an argument in the home (Dalton J). Sentencing remarks available on SCLQ Sentencing Remarks database (no citation).
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2020] QCA 9106 May 2020Leave to appeal against sentence granted and appeal allowed; sentence manifestly excessive; paying due regard to lack of criminal history, immediate remorse, and early plea, offender should be eligible for parole after serving 3 years in custody: Sofronoff P and Mullins JA (Boddice J dissenting, granting leave to appeal but dismissing the appeal, holding that 9-year sentence without early parole eligibility ‘fell within a sound exercise of the sentencing discretion’).

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.