To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Application under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld) that the applicant was the subject of both direct and indirect discrimination; application dismissed: Member Fitzpatrick.
Primary Judgment
[2018] QCAT 425
19 Dec 2018
Costs judgment (from [2018] QCAT 409): Member Fitzpatrick.
Primary Judgment
[2020] QCATA 76
22 May 2020
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; decision made 16 November 2018 set aside and in lieu, it is declared the use of male pronouns to refer to the applicants constituted unlawful indirect discrimination, however the complaint alleging unlawful discrimination in relation to the imposition of internal management plans dismissed; respondents required to make a private apology pursuant to s 209(1)(d) of the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld): Senior Member Howard and Member Traves.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2021] QCA 56 (2021) 7 QR 474
26 Mar 2021
-
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2021] QCA 74
16 Apr 2021
-
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
