Sanrus Pty Ltd v Monto Coal 2 Pty Ltd (No 8)
[2019] QSC 255
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Sanrus Pty Ltd & Ors v Monto Coal 2 Pty Ltd & Ors (No 8)
Sanrus Pty Ltd v Monto Coal 2 Pty Ltd (No 8)
[2019] QSC 255
QSC
Bond J
14 Oct 2019
Event | Citation or File | Date | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Primary Judgment | [2018] QSC 308 | 19 Dec 2018 | Plaintiffs' application for leave to rely on reports delivered outside a Court directed timetable allowed; plaintiffs' application for leave to amend their statement of claim granted; consequential alterations to Court directed timetable allowed; defendants' cross-application for an order that plaintiff not be permitted to rely on certain expert reports refused; plaintiffs' to pay defendants' costs thrown away on the indemnity basis: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 144 | 07 Jun 2019 | Plaintiffs' application for further disclosure pursuant to r 223(1)(b) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) on the grounds of waiver of privilege dismissed (with ancillary directions as to document removal and redaction): Flanagan J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 162 | 26 Jun 2019 | Plaintiff's application for leave to adduce further expert evidence (and other ancillary orders) part way through the hearing of a trial refused: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 185 | 01 Aug 2019 | Defendants' application for leave to rely on two affidavits as lay evidence mid-way through trial granted subject to conditions: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 199 | 12 Aug 2019 | Plaintiffs' application for leave to rely at trial on new material in the joint expert reports and consequential leave to amend the plaintiffs' statement of claim granted; defendants granted leave to rely at trial on responsive expert reports: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 210 | 27 Aug 2019 | Provisional rulings on defendants' objections to expert evidence: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 214 | 29 Aug 2019 | Consequential directions as a result of the Court of Appeal's (majority) decision in [2019] QCA 160: the plaintiffs have leave to produce a further report from Mr Chris Hartley by 3 September 2019 with ancillary directions as to what the evidence is to be directed to: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 241 | 27 Sep 2019 | Plaintiffs' not permitted to advance an unpleaded advice case; plaintiff's granted leave to rely on an expert report, but not for the plaintiffs' unpleaded advice case; rulings on defendants' objections to plaintiffs' expert evidence (following on from Bond J's provisional rulings in [2019] QSC 210): Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 255 | 14 Oct 2019 | Rulings on plaintiffs' objections to expert evidence: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2019] QSC 297 | 29 Nov 2019 | Second and third defendants' application for judgment in light of the plaintiffs' amendments to the consolidated statement of claim on 29 November 2019; plaintiffs' claim against the third defendant dismissed; second defendant's application for judgment adjourned to a date to be fixed: Bond J. |
Primary Judgment | [2020] QSC 5 | 31 Jan 2020 | Upon the parties' settlement: the plaintiffs have leave nunc pro tunc to discontinue the whole of the claim against the first and second defendants (with no order as to costs): Bond J. |
Notice of Appeal Filed | File Number: Appeal 6710/19 | 27 Jun 2019 | - |
Appeal Determined (QCA) | [2019] QCA 160 | 20 Aug 2019 | Appeal from [2019] QSC 162 allowed; orders made on 18 June 2019 set aside; appellants permitted to adduce expert evidence in the form of the report of Mr Chris Hartley filed 10 June 2019 (save for certain paragraphs): McMurdo JA and Bradley J (Applegarth J dissenting). |