To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Defendants prosecuted under Excise Act 1901 (Cth) for possessing quantities of tobacco upon which excise duty had not been paid contrary to s 117(1) of the Act; Behluli and Cocaj fined $40,000 and $41,000 respectively
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2004] QCA 69 [2004] 2 Qd R 448
18 Mar 2004
Defendants appealed against validity of penalties imposed; whether s 134(2) of Excise Act 1901 (Cth) limited maximum penalty to $20,000 regardless of number of offences charged; appeal dismissed: M McMurdo P, Williams JA and White J
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2004] QCA 122
23 Apr 2004
Commissioner applied to amend orders in [2004] QCA 69 to include costs of appeal; whether costs should follow the event; order amended accordingly: M McMurdo P, Williams JA and White J
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
