To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Defendant found guilty of one count of displaying for sale an objectionable film and one count of selling prohibited publications contrary to ss 39 and 12 of the Classification of Publications Act 1991 (Qld); fined $4,000 with no conviction recorded
Primary Judgment
DC No 4427 of 2004 (no citation)
28 Sep 2005
Defendant appealed against conviction; whether Magistrate erred in refusing defendant to cross-examine prosecution witnesses involved in certifying classification of the relevant films; where defendant could not articulate forensic purpose of cross-examination; appeal dismissed
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2006] QCA 35 [2007] 1 Qd R 261
17 Feb 2006
Defendant applied for leave to appeal against order of District Court; whether defendant's right to test nature of prosecution case in quasi-criminal proceeding unduly restricted; leave to appeal refused: de Jersey CJ, Williams and Keane JJA
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
