To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Judgment of trial for damages for misleading and deceptive conduct under the ASIC Act and negligence arising from the giving of financial advice; lent sum of money upon security of promissory notes on recommendation, that ultimately failed and offered no return; judgment for the plaintiff: Forde DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QDC 199
31 Aug 2007
Costs reasons following judgment on 9 August 2007; defendants pay plaintiffs costs: Forde DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QDC 244
10 Oct 2007
Application for stay of enforcement of judgment pending appeal; the respondent’s financial position is such that if the judgment moneys are paid over to the respondent and the appeal is successful, the applicant will not be able to get it back; not an appropriate case for a stay to be granted: Koppenol DCJ.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2008] QCA 74
04 Apr 2008
Appeals dismissed with costs; appeal against successful claim for misleading and deceptive conduct under the ASIC act and negligence regarding the provision of financial advice; cross-appeal against cost order; no ground of appeal successful and no error in cost discretion: Keane and Fraser JJA and Chesterman J.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
