To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Jury determination that one imputation was not conveyed and two other imputations were conveyed but not defamatory; publication attracts defence of qualified privilege pursuant to s.30 Defamation Act 1995: Chesterman J
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2009] QCA 186
10 Jul 2009
Verdict of the jury was reasonably open to it: Keane, verdict of the jury was reasonably open to it except as to imputation 2; jury’s finding that imputation 2 was not defamatory of the appellant was one that no reasonable jury could make; Muir and Fraser JJA; trial judge's reasons for finding a defence under s.30 Defamation Act 2005 are compelling; appeal dismissed: Keane, Muir and Fraser JJA
Special Leave Refused (HCA)
[2010] HCASL 77
31 Mar 2010
Application does not have sufficient prospects to warrant grant of special leave to appeal; application for special leave to appeal dismissed: Gummow and Kiefel JJ
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
