Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

Zabusky v Virgtel Ltd[2012] QCA 107

Reported at [2013] 1 Qd R 285

Zabusky v Virgtel Ltd[2012] QCA 107

Reported at [2013] 1 Qd R 285
CITATION: Zabusky v Virgtel Ltd [2012] QCA 107
JUDGE(S): Holmes JA, Chesterman JA, P Lyons J
DELIVERED ON: 20 April 2012
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Zabusky & Ors v Virgtel Ltd & Ors

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Zabusky v Virgtel Ltd

  • Reported Citation:

    [2013] 1 Qd R 285

  • MNC:

    [2012] QCA 107

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Holmes JA, Chesterman JA, P Lyons J

  • Date:

    20 Apr 2012

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary Judgment[2011] QSC 26909 Sep 2011At its most basic, this case concerned the van Leeuwen interests contending that Mr Zabusky wrongly directed large sums of money to himself and his related interest when such money was intended for Virgin Technologies Ltd (in which Mr van Leeuwen and Mr Zabusky indirectly had interests). Application by Zabusky interests for temporary stay dismissed. Application for joinder of Viscaya Armadora SA allowed: Daubney J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2012] QCA 107 [2013] 1 Qd R 285, (2012) 262 FLR 100, (2012) 88 ACSR 18820 Apr 2012Appellants claimed that derivative action was not properly constituted because it was brought by unregistered shareholders and, as such, they had no standing. Appeal dismissed with costs: Holmes JA, Chesterman JA, P Lyons J.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.