Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of The City of Gold Coast[2024] ICQ 6

Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of The City of Gold Coast[2024] ICQ 6

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of The City of Gold Coast [2024] ICQ 6

PARTIES:

QUEENSLAND SERVICES, INDUSTRIAL UNION OF EMPLOYEES

(appellant)

v

COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLD COAST

(respondent)

FILE NO:

C/2023/27

PROCEEDING:

Appeal

DELIVERED ON:

11 March 2024

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

27 February 2024

MEMBER:

Davis J, President

ORDER:

Appeal dismissed

CATCHWORDS:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – QUEENSLAND – AGREEMENTS – where the Union’s member was employed by the Council of the City of Gold Coast (the Council) – where the employment was governed by a certified agreement – where the certified agreement provided for employees to work 36.25 hours per week across a nine day fortnight – where the agreement provided that the Council may designate some positions as ten day a fortnight positions – where ten day a fortnight positions attract no rostered day off and 40.3 hours per week work with a 14% pay loading – where the Union’s member took parental leave – where the Union’s member held a ten day a fortnight position – where the Union’s member returned to the same position – where upon return to work the Union’s member worked part-time by agreement of the Council – where the Agreement provided a formula for the calculation of part-time remuneration – whether the calculation should be on the basis of the longer hours and 14% loading of a ten day per fortnight position

LEGISLATION:

Industrial Relations Act 2016, s 88, s 557, s 565, Sch 5

CASES:

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410; [1995] HCA 24 cited

Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253; [2011] HCA 26 cited

Ex parte McLean (1930) 43 CLR 472; [1930] HCA 12 cited

Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2020) 271 CLR 495; [2020] HCA 29 followed

Illawarra County Council v Federated Municipal & Shire Employees’ Union of Australia (1985) 11 IR 18 cited

Qantas Airways Ltd v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280; [1998] HCA 18 cited

Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of the City of Gold Coast [2023] QIRC 181 related

R v A2 (2019) 269 CLR 507; [2019] HCA 35 followed

Thomson v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 116 IR 186; [2002] FCA 939 cited

REPRESENTATION:

N Henderson, Secretary of the Appellant

M Osborne (solicitor), Norton Rose Fulbright for the Respondent

  1. [1]
    The Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees (the Union) appeals a decision of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission (QIRC), declaring the construction of a certified agreement which governs the employment of one of their members (the Union’s member).[1]

Background

  1. [2]
    On or about 9 May 2016, the Union’s member commenced employment with the respondent, the Council of the City of Gold Coast (the Council).  The Council and the Union’s member had entered into a contract of employment on 28 April 2016.
  2. [3]
    The Union’s member is an engineer, employed by the Council as a Senior Coastal Engineer.  Her employment terms and conditions are governed by the ‘Queensland Government Industry (Stream A) Award – State 2017’ (the Award) and the ‘Council Certified Agreement 2019’ (the 2019 Agreement).
  3. [4]
    By the terms of the 2019 Agreement all employees within Stream A, except those subject to the “ten-day fortnight provisions”, are entitled to one rostered day off (RDO) per fortnight.  This results, obviously enough, in a nine-day working fortnight.
  4. [5]
    The RDO provisions effectively operate as a “spread of hours” arrangement.  Each employee who is entitled to an RDO still works the full load of 36.25 hours per week.
  5. [6]
    No doubt for operational reasons, the demands of some employee’s positions are such as to require them to work a ten-day fortnight.  This is provided for by the 2019 Agreement.  Such employees do not receive the benefit of the RDO but receive a loading of 14% of their salary.
  6. [7]
    Employees who receive the 14% loading, but no RDO, work extra hours.  Their weekly work time is 40.3 hours.
  7. [8]
    The Union’s member’s position as Senior Coastal Engineer was one designated by the Council as attracting the ten-day fortnight provisions.  The Union member’s contract of employment provided:

Salary

On commencement your salary will be $105,135.76 per annum.  This salary is commensurate with your employment on a ten day fortnight.  Your classification will be Level 8, Incremental Step 1 as per the Queensland Local Government Officers Award.

Hours

Your working hours are based on 40.3 per week[2], working a ten day fortnight.  Core business hours are from 6am to 6pm.  Start and finish times are set to meet operational requirements, by mutual agreement.”

  1. [9]
    On or about 17 April 2021, the Union’s member commenced a period of parental leave.  On about 18 October 2022 she returned to the position of Senior Coastal Engineer but, by agreement with the Council, she worked on a part time basis. 
  2. [10]
    Initially upon return to work the Union’s member was working 32.4 hours per fortnight.  She is now working 40 hours per fortnight.
  3. [11]
    Contained in the 2019 Agreement is a provision whereby the salary of a part-time employee is calculated pro rata to hours worked.
  4. [12]
    The Union’s position, both before the QIRC and on appeal, is that the pro rata calculation for the part time work should be made on the basis of a ten-day fortnight and a salary including the 14% loading.
  5. [13]
    The Council’s position, both before the QIRC and on appeal, is that the pro rata calculation for the part time work should be made on the basis of a nine-day fortnight at the base salary without the 14% loading.
  6. [14]
    The difference between these two calculations to a 40 hours per fortnight part time workload calculates to a yearly difference in salary of $1,688.44.  The calculations on both a 32.4 hour fortnight and a 40 hour fortnight are as follows:

Based on annual salary without 14% loading

  • Annual Salary - $120,322.00
  • Hourly Rate - $120,322.00 ÷ 52 weeks ÷ 36.25 hours = $63.8313 per hour
  • Fortnightly Rate working 32.4 hours per fortnight (up to February 2024) - $63.8313 per hour x 32.4 hours = $2,068.1341 per fortnight
  • Fortnightly Rate working 40 hours per fortnight (from February 2024) - $63.8313 per hour x 40 hours = $2,553.252 per fortnight
  • Yearly Rate working 32.4 hours per fortnight (up to February 2024) - $2,068.1341 per fortnight x 26 fortnights = $53,771.4866 per annum
  • Yearly Rate working 40 hours per fortnight (from February 2024) - $2,553.252 per fortnight x 26 fortnights = $66,384.552 per annum

Based on annual salary plus 14% loading

  • Annual Salary - $137,167.08
  • Hourly Rate – Annual Salary ÷ 52 weeks ÷ 40.30 hours = $65.4548 per hour
  • Fortnightly Rate working 32.4 hours per fortnight (up to February 2024) - $65.4548 per hour x 32.4 hours = $2,120.7355 per fortnight
  • Fortnightly Rate working 40 hours per fortnight (from February 2024) - $65.4548 per hour x 40 hours = $2,618.192 per fortnight
  • Yearly Rate working 32.4 hours per fortnight (up to February 2024) - $2,120.7355 per fortnight x 26 fortnights = $55,139.1235 per annum
  • Yearly Rate working 40 hours per fortnight (from February 2024) - $2,618.192 per fortnight x 26 fortnights = $68,072.992 per annum
  1. [15]
    The following question was posed for determination by the QIRC:

“Where an employee, who is engaged to work a ten (10) day fortnight under clause 6.3 of the City of Gold Coast Certified Agreement 2019 (Agreement) requests to return to work after a period of primary carers leave on a part-time basis, do the provisions of clause 9.5.14 of the Agreement entitle the employee to be paid the salary equivalent to their ten (10) day fortnight position on a pro rata basis?”[3]

  1. [16]
    The QIRC answered that question “No” and in so doing produced detailed and careful reasons.[4]
  2. [17]
    The Union appeals on the following grounds:

“a. at [62] when the Commission determined that the designation of the affected employee’s role as a 10 day fortnight did not set it aside from other provisions of the City of Gold Coast Agreement 2019 (the 2019 Agreement).

b. at [64] in finding that the position that the affected employee was entitled to return to under the provisions of clause 9.5.14 of the 2019 Agreement did not include all of the entitlements of the position including the designated rate of pay.

c. at [67] in finding that the provisions of Clause 6.3 of the 2019 Agreement applied, when the applicable provisions are contained in Clause 9.5.11 a iii.

d. in finding that the employee was a part time employee when the employee was an employee who had an entitlement to return to work in the position which they held immediately before proceeding on Primary Care Leave and the right to request a return to work on a part time basis in that position.”[5]

  1. [18]
    By s 557 of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 (IR Act) appeals from the QIRC to this Court are limited to errors of law or jurisdiction except by leave.[6]
  2. [19]
    An error in construing an industrial instrument is an error of law.  There is only one proper construction.  Therefore, the QIRC is either right in its construction or wrong.  If it is wrong, then it is irrelevant how the wrong decision was reached.  An error of law will be established.  There is, therefore, no need to consider each of the grounds of appeal.  The appeal will be decided upon the proper construction of the 2019 Agreement.

Proper construction of the 2019 Agreement

  1. [20]
    The purpose of construction of any legal instrument[7] is to ascertain the objective meaning of the text with reference to the context of the relevant clause or provision.  The context includes the document’s purpose and any statutory scheme against which it was enacted or agreed.[8] 
  2. [21]
    The 2019 Agreement is one of two industrial instruments which govern the Union’s member’s employment.  The other is the Award.[9]  The 2019 Agreement was made in the context of both the Award and the statutory scheme established by the IR Act. 
  3. [22]
    The Union’s member’s terms of employment derive from each of the IR Act, the Award, the 2019 Agreement and the contract of employment.[10]  The 2019 agreement is a contractual one entered into between an employer and employee representatives and must be construed in an industrial context.[11] 
  4. [23]
    The 2019 Agreement recognises that it must be read with the Award.  By cl 1.8 of the 2019 Agreement:

1.8. Relationship to Modern Awards

“1.8.1 This Agreement shall be read and interpreted wholly in conjunction with the Modern Awards, provided that where there is any inconsistency, this Agreement shall prevail.

1.8.2 Further, where this Agreement is silent, the provisions of the relevant Modern Award, shall apply.”

  1. [24]
    Part 4 of the Award deals with minimum wages, salary levels, allowances and related matters.  Clause 12 concerns classifications and minimum wage and salary levels.  Clause 12(a) provides as follows:

“12. Classifications and minimum wage and salary levels

  1. In addition to the provisions of clause 12(b), which has common application to all employees covered by this Award, specific provisions concerning employee classifications and minimum wage levels relevant to each area of local government employment covered by this Award are contained in clause 12 in each Section of Division 2 in this Award. ”[12]
  1. [25]
    The Award contains two divisions.  Division 1 contains award provisions which apply to all employees.  Division 2 is then broken into three sections, each of which contain particular provisions relevant to a particular category of employees.
  2. [26]
    Section 1 of Division 2 concerns “administrative, clerical, professional, community service, supervisory and managerial services”.  It is the section which concerns the Union’s member.
  3. [27]
    Clause 12 of s 1 of Division 2 then classifies the various levels, being Levels 1 to 8.  All levels except Level 8 have within them sublevels, reflecting length of service.  Level 8 is dealt with somewhat differently and there is only one classification and then a separate series of benefits are provided for, depending upon various things including length of service.[13]  As earlier observed, the Union’s member was employed as Level 8.
  4. [28]
    The Award provides that parental leave is an entitlement bestowed by Division 8 of the Queensland Employment Standards contained within the IR Act.  Section 88 of the IR Act provides, relevantly:

88  Return to work after parental leave etc.

  1. This section applies to an employee who returns to work after

 (a)  parental leave; or

 (b)  special pregnancy-related leave or sick leave under section 85.

  1. The employee is entitled to be employed in

 (a)  the position held by the employee immediately before starting parental leave; or

 (b)  if the employee worked part-time because of the pregnancy before starting birth-related leave—the position held by the employee immediately before starting part-time work; or

 (c)  if the employee was transferred to a safe job under section 89 before starting birth-related leave—the position held by the employee immediately before the transfer.

…” (emphasis added)

  1. [29]
    The 2019 Agreement recognises part time employment and cl 3.2 provides relevantly:

3.2 Part-time employment

3.2.1 The City acknowledges the importance of work arrangements that assist staff to balance their various work and life responsibilities.  Employees may wish to seek flexible or part time work arrangements for a variety of reasons.  Part-time work is an option that is currently available to City Employees where operational requirements permit.  Within that limitation, the City is committed to providing Employees with access to flexible work options that enhance their work and life balance.

3.2.2 Part-time employment means employment for fewer than the normal weekly ordinary hours specified for a full-time Employee by the relevant Modern Award, and for which entitlements are paid on a pro-rata basis.

3.2.3 At the time of employment on a part-time basis, the City and the part-time Employee will agree in writing on a pattern of work relevant to the position, which will specify the number and the spread of ordinary weekly hours to be worked.  The agreed pattern of work may be varied by mutual agreement.  Any such agreed amendment to the Employee’s hours of work will be recorded in writing.

3.2.4 The ordinary hourly rate of pay for a part-time Employee will be calculated by dividing the annual salary (as specified in this Agreement for the Employee’s classification) by fifty-two (52) and then dividing the result by the normal weekly ordinary hours specified for a full-time Employee by the Modern Award relevant to the part-time Employee’s classification.

...”

  1. [30]
    Clause 6 concerns hours and arrangements of work.  It is cl 6.2 which provides for the nine-day fortnight.  It provides:

6.2 Nine-day fortnight provisions

6.2.1 In addition to the provisions contained within the relevant Modern Award, this clause only applies to Employees covered by the Queensland Local Government Industry (Stream A) Award – State 2017.

6.2.2 Hours of duty

 a. Except in accordance with clause 6.1, the indicative ordinary hours of duty to be worked by employees working a nine-day fortnight arrangement may be as follows:

 8.00am Commence work

 10 minute Tea break to be taken mid-morning

 45 minute Lunch break taken between noon and 2.00pm

 4.40pm Finish work.

 b. Notwithstanding the above, the ordinary hours of duty for Employees on this arrangement shall be in accordance with the Queensland Local Government Industry (Stream A) Award – State 2017, being an average of 36.25 hours per week or 7.25 hours per day, inclusive between the hours of 6.00am to 6.00pm.  This spread of hours is available to ensure flexibility in relation to the start and finish times so that each Branch / Work Unit is able to set the Employees’ hours of work to meet their own operational requirements by mutual agreement in writing with the Employee.

 c. The Parties acknowledge that the daily standard ordinary hours (as specified above) include an earlier finish time, in return for forgoing an afternoon tea break of ten (10) minutes.  In other words, no afternoon tea break is taken so that the Employee’s finish time can be earlier.

6.2.3 Days off

 a. Each Employee working the hours provided in clause 6.2 above shall be entitled to a rostered day off without reduction in pay each and every fortnight of employment.  The day on which such rostered day off is to be taken, shall be determined by mutual agreement between the Supervisor / Manager or delegated person and the Employee.

 b. Where a rostered day off falls on a day prescribed as a public holiday in clause 9.13 of this Agreement, an additional rostered day off in lieu shall be made available.

 c. The Supervisor / Manager or delegated person shall prepare rosters in accordance with the above for each quarter.  Such rosters shall be displayed on the City’s notice boards at least two (2) weeks before the commencement of each quarter.

 d. Where special circumstances can be demonstrated an Employee may request and the Manager may approve the rostered day off each fortnight being on some other day.  Flexible use of RDOs will be available in accordance with clause 6.4 of this Agreement.  Where special circumstances exist, an Employee’s rostered day off may be postponed from its rostered date to some other day.

 e. Employee’s employed pursuant to this clause, who supervise or support Employees who work a nine (9) day fortnight with a common rostered day off shall be entitled to have the same day off without reduction in pay as the Employees they supervise or support.

 …”

  1. [31]
    Clause 6.3 introduces the ten-day fortnight as an exception to the nine-day fortnight arrangements established by cl 6.2.  Clause 6.3 provides relevantly:

6.3 Ten-day Fortnight provisions

6.3.1 The conditions applicable in this clause apply to Employees within the classifications contained in the Queensland Local Government Industry (Stream A) Award - State 2017, and whose position is assessed, as requiring them to be present each working day. For the avoidance of any doubt, the provisions contained within this clause will override any provisions contained within any Local Area Agreement.

6.3.2 Certain positions within the classifications described above, may be required to be present over ten (10) days per fortnight (and therefore not able to enjoy an RDO arrangement) and are employed on a ten (10) day fortnight basis, with an additional loading paid. This arrangement is set out in this clause.

6.3.3 Hours of Duty – Ten Day Fortnight (14 per cent Loading)

 a. Except as otherwise provided for in clause 6.1, the standard hours of work for Employees working under this arrangement shall be an average of 8.06 hours per day, 40.3              hours per week, worked over a ten (10) day fortnight. Employees working under this arrangement are not entitled to a RDO as per the nine (9) day fortnight arrangements.

 b. To ensure the operational requirements of each Branch/Work Unit are met, start and finish times within the spread of hours can be negotiated at the workplace level by mutual agreement. Provided that the continuous hours worked before overtime is paid shall remain at 8.06 hours per day.

6.3.4 Remuneration

 It is recognised by the Parties that the standard hours of work under the ten (10) day fortnight arrangement are in excess of the provisions as contained within the relevant Modern Award.  Therefore, a premium payment of 14 per cent of the Employee’s base annual salary shall be paid to Employees working under this arrangement.  This additional, all-purpose payment will form part of the employee’s base salary and is paid to compensate employees for working a ten (10) day fortnight without a Rostered Day Off.

6.3.5 Overtime

 a. Hours worked in excess of those specified above in 6.3.3 Hours of Duty will be subject to the overtime provisions as contained within the relevant Modern Award.

 b. Any additional time worked must be approved by the Branch Manager prior to being worked.

6.3.7 Removal from Ten (10) Day Fortnight Positions

 Where a position is classified as a ten (10) day fortnight position in accordance with these arrangements, and subsequently it is determined by management that the position must revert to a nine (9) day fortnight, due to operational or structural requirements, the incumbent Employee will be given three (3) months’ notice before the change is affected [sic].

 Clause 1.5 of LAA 2.23 contained in Part 2 of this Agreement will be read as requiring three (3) months’ notice before the change is effected in lieu of the six (6) month period stated. [sic]”

  1. [32]
    Clause 9.5 concerns parental leave.  Importantly, cl 9.5 provides:

9.5 Parental Leave

9.5.1 Subject to the terms of this clause Employees are entitled to Parental Leave and to work part-time in connection with the birth, adoption or surrogacy of a child.

9.5.2 The provisions of this clause apply to full-time, part-time and eligible casual Employees, but do not apply to other casual Employees.

9.5.11 Right to request

 a. An Employee entitled to Primary Carers Leave pursuant to the provisions of clause 9.5.9 may request the City to allow the Employee:

  i. to extend the period of simultaneous unpaid Primary Carer Leave provided for in clauses 9.5.9 up to a maximum of eight (8) weeks;

  ii. to extend the period of unpaid Primary Carer Leave provided for in clause 9.5.9 by a further continuous period of leave not exceeding twelve (12) months;

  iii. to return from a period of Primary Carer Leave on a part-time basis until the child reaches school age;

   to assist the Employee in reconciling work and parental responsibilities.

 b. The City shall consider the request having regard to the Employee’s circumstances and, provided the request is genuinely based on the Employee’s parental responsibilities, may only refuse the request on reasonable grounds related to the effect on the workplace or the City’s business. Such grounds might include cost, lack of adequate replacement staff, loss of efficiency and the impact on customer service.

 c. The Employee’s request and the City’s decision shall be in writing The Employee’s request and the City’s decision made under 9.5.11 must be recorded in writing.”

9.5.12 Request to return to work part-time

 a. Where an Employee wishes to make a request under clause 9.5.11, such a request must be made as soon as possible but not less than seven (7) weeks prior to the date upon which the employee is due to return to work from Parental Leave.

9.5.14 Returning to work after a period of Primary Carer’s Leave

 a. An Employee will notify of their intention to return to work after a period of Primary Carer’s Leave at least four (4) weeks prior to the expiration of the leave.

 b. An Employee will be entitled to the position which they held immediately before proceeding on Primary Carer Leave. In the case of an Employee transferred to a safe job pursuant to clause 9.5.13, the Employee will be entitled to return to the position they held immediately before such transfer.

 c.  Where such position no longer exists but there are other positions available which the Employee is qualified for and is capable of performing, the Employee will be entitled to a position as nearly comparable in status and pay to that of their former position.

 d. An eligible casual resource who is employed by a labour hire company who performs work for a client of the labour hire company will be entitled to the position which they held immediately before proceeding on Primary Carer Leave.

 e. Where such a position is no longer available, but there are other positions available that the Employee is qualified for and is capable of performing, the City shall make all reasonable attempts to return the Employee to a position comparable in status and pay to that of the Employee’s former position

9.5.20 Parental Leave and other entitlements

 An Employee may in lieu of or in conjunction with Parental Leave, access any Annual Leave or Long Service Leave entitlements which they have accrued subject to the total amount of leave not exceeding fifty-two (52) weeks or a longer period as agreed under clause 9.5.11.  Employees applying for Parental Leave may also apply to take double the period of Long Service Leave at half pay (e.g. spread twelve (12) weeks Long Service Leave over a period of twenty-four (24) with the employee receiving salary at the half pay rate).  This is providing that the total period away from work does not exceed fifty-two (52) weeks).  The election of such an option must be made prior to the commencement of Parental Leave.”

  1. [33]
    Clause 3.2.4 of the 2019 Agreement is the critical provision.[14]  However, it has to be construed in the light of the other provisions.
  2. [34]
    As already observed, cl 6.2[15] establishes a nine-day fortnight for employees under the Award.  As earlier observed, cl 6.2 is in effect a spread agreement and its effect is:
    1. a working week of 36.25 hours; and
    2. a spread over nine days.
  3. [35]
    Clause 6.3[16], which establishes a ten-day fortnight for some employees, only comes into operation where the Council assesses the position as such as to require the workers to be present each working day.  Clause 6.3 refers to the employee’s “position”.[17]  It is clear that it is the “position” that is designated to the ten-day fortnight conditions.  The 14% loading then applies and there is an increase of hours worked from 36.25 hours per week to 40.3.
  4. [36]
    By force of the parental leave provisions,[18] an Employee returns to their “position” after a period of parental leave.[19] By cl 9.5.11(a)(iii)[20] the employee may request return to work on a part-time basis.  That is an action taken by the employee.  It is not an action taken by the Council under cl 6.3.7 to remove the “position” from the ten-day fortnight provisions.  The employee returns to the “position” that is designated by the Council as one to which the ten-day fortnight conditions apply.
  5. [37]
    If the worker makes an election under cl 9.5.11 and the Council accepts the request, then the employee works part-time on a ten-day fortnight position; here as a Coastal Engineer.
  6. [38]
    There is nothing incongruous about an employee who falls within the ten-day fortnight provisions working part-time.  The Council’s requirements for the position to be worked over a ten-day fortnight remain and no doubt rostering arrangements will result in the Union’s member’s position of a Coastal Engineer being filled 10 days over the fortnight.
  7. [39]
    The Council’s actions in accepting the part time arrangement does not remove the Union’s member’s position from the ten-day fortnight arrangements pursuant to cl 6.3.7.  The “position” remains one that is designated as a ten day per fortnight position under cl 6.3.
  8. [40]
    The central issue though is not the classification of the position but the calculation of the pro rata part time remuneration.
  9. [41]
    This is dealt with by cl 3.2.4 of the 2019 Agreement.
  10. [42]
    The parties could have agreed separate provisions for the calculation of part-time remuneration for nine day a fortnight workers and for a different calculation for ten day a fortnight workers.  There is though nothing in the 2019 Agreement to suggest that there is a differentiation.  Clause 6.3, which establishes the ten-day fortnight system, does not provide for the calculation of remuneration in the case of part-time, ten day a fortnight employees. The only relevant clause is 3.2.4.
  11. [43]
    Clause 3.2.4 is, in my view, quite clear.  The following should be noted:
    1. the clause provides for the calculation of “the ordinary hourly rate of pay for a part-time Employee”;
    2. the notion of “part-time Employee” does not draw any distinction between part-time nine day per fortnight employees or part-time ten day per fortnight employees;
    3. the starting point for the calculation is the “annual salary (as specified in this Agreement for the Employee’s classification)”;
    4. “Annual salary” is linked in cl 3.2.4 to “classification” under the Award, not the designation of certain positions under cl 6.3.1 and not to the loading; and
    5. the next step in the calculation is to divide the salary by 52 weeks and then divide the result “by the normal weekly ordinary hours specified for a full-time employee by the Modern Award relevant to the part-time employee’s classification”.  Those “weekly ordinary hours” must be 36.25 not 40.3 hours specified in cl 6.3 for ten day a fortnight employees.
  12. [44]
    What is adopted for the calculation is the salary payable without the loading.  That disadvantage to the ten day per fortnight worker is in part off set by the fact that the hours worked for the purposes of the calculation is not the ten day per fortnight rate (40.3) but the ordinary hours of 36.25. 
  13. [45]
    However, the literal meaning of cl 3.2.4 is clear and is as I have described it, and that meaning is consistent with the purpose of cl 6.3.
  14. [46]
    Clause 6.3.4 explains why the premium of 14% is being paid.  Firstly, it is because the “standard hours of work under the ten (10) day fortnight arrangement[21] are in excess of the provisions as contained within the relevant Modern Award”.[22]  The part-time employee does not work the extra hours. 
  15. [47]
    By cl 6.3.4 the 14% loading “is paid to compensate employees for working a ten (10) day fortnight without a rostered day off”.  There is no need to compensate a part-time employee for not having an RDO. 
  16. [48]
    Again, by cl 6.3.4, the 14% loading is to be “paid to Employees working under this arrangement”.  The “arrangement” is, clearly enough, a 40.3 hour working week spread over a ten day per fortnight cycle with no RDO.  A part-time employee is simply not working under that “arrangement”.
  17. [49]
    An employee who holds a position that has been designated a ten day per fortnight position may avail themselves of parental leave and may request a return on a part-time basis.  However, the part-time remuneration will be calculated pursuant to cl 3.2.4, which is the only clause in the 2019 Agreement concerning the calculation of part-time remuneration.  If the employee later returns to working full-time and the position has not been removed from the ten day per fortnight provisions pursuant to cl 6.3.7, then the employee’s weekly workload will be 40.3 hours per week, with a ten day working fortnight with no RDO but will attract the 14% loading.
  18. [50]
    Finally, it was submitted by the Union that if the part-time remuneration was calculated by reference to a formula not including the loading then the Union’s member has been discriminated against by virtue of taking paternal leave. It was submitted that a construction of the 2019 Agreement to that effect should be avoided.
  19. [51]
    That submission must be rejected.  In Illawarra County Council v Federated Municipal & Shire Employees’ Union of Australia,[23] Glynn J, when considering a return to work after maternity leave pursuant to New South Wales legislation, observed:

“In my view, what the legislature sought to attain by the insertion of Pt XIVA was that an employee, on return from maternity leave, would take up again a discrete set of duties at the same level in the hierarchy of the employer’s organisation and at the same level of salary or wages as she had been so placed and had so received before proceeding on that leave.

If the discrete set of duties previously undertaken by her had disappeared on her return she was to be offered other duties carrying as close as possible the status and salary or wages of her pre-leave position.”[24] (emphasis added)

  1. [52]
    Before the Union’s member went on parental leave, she and the Council may have agreed for her to work part-time in her ten day per fortnight position.  If that had occurred, she would have been paid pursuant to cl 3.2.4 as I have construed it.
  2. [53]
    When the Union’s member returned to work after parental leave, she returned to her position as a Coastal Engineer.  She took up the same duties at the same level in the hierarchy of the Council’s operations.  She could not expect to receive the same salary because she was working a part-time load.  She will return to the same salary once she resumes full-time employment.  In the meantime, her part-time remuneration is calculated, like all Council employees (including those occupying a ten day per fortnight designated position) pursuant to cl 3.2.4 of the 2019 Agreement.  There is no discrimination.
  3. [54]
    There was no error in the conclusion reached in the QIRC and the appeal must be dismissed.
  4. [55]
    Order:

Appeal dismissed.

Footnotes

[1]Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of the City of Gold Coast [2023] QIRC 181.

[2] Obviously a reference to 40.3 hours.

[3]Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of the City of Gold Coast [2023] QIRC 181 at [11].

[4]Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of the City of Gold Coast [2023] QIRC 181.

[5]The references are to paragraphs in the decision from which the appeal is brought.

[6]The circumstances in which leave can be granted is limited: Industrial Relations Act 2016 s 565.

[7]In Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253, Crennan and Heydon JJ did not distinguish, in approach to construction between statutes, contracts and testamentary instruments.

[8]R v A2 (2019) 269 CLR 507 at [32]-[44] and [162]-[165].

[9]Industrial Relations Act 2016, Schedule 5 “industrial instrument”.

[10]Ex parte McLean (1930) 43 CLR 472 at 479 and Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 at 418-421.

[11]Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2020) 271 CLR 495 at [3].

[12]Clause 12(b) of Division 1 deals with pay cycles, etc.

[13]Clause 12.1 of Section 1 of Division 2 concerns “Minimum Wage levels”.  Clause 12.1(a)(i) concerns classifications, and clause 12.1(a)(ii) concerns “Additional payments for senior officers and employees” who are those at Level 8.

[14]It appears at paragraph [29] of these reasons.

[15]It appears at paragraph [30] of these reasons.

[16]It appears at paragraph [31] of these reasons.

[17]Thomson v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 116 IR 186 at [129]-[136]; and Qantas Airways Ltd v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280 at [72]-[73] and [104]-[107].

[18]Clause 9.

[19]Industrial Relations Act 2016, s 88.

[20]It appears at paragraph [32] of these reasons.

[21]40.3 hours per week.

[22]36.25 hours per week.

[23](1985) 11 IR 18.

[24]At page 20.

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of The City of Gold Coast

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of The City of Gold Coast

  • MNC:

    [2024] ICQ 6

  • Court:

    ICQ

  • Judge(s):

    Davis J, President

  • Date:

    11 Mar 2024

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410
2 citations
Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd [1995] HCA 24
1 citation
Byrnes v Kendle [2011] HCA 26
1 citation
Byrnes v Kendle (2011) 243 CLR 253
2 citations
Ex parte McLean (1930) 43 CLR 472
2 citations
Ex parte McLean [1930] HCA 12
1 citation
Illawarra County Council v Federated Municipal & Shire Employees’ Union of Australia (1985) 11 IR 18
2 citations
Jobs and Industrial Relations v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2020] HCA 29
1 citation
Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (2020) 271 CLR 495
2 citations
Qantas Airways Ltd v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280
2 citations
Qantas Airways Ltd v Christie (1998) HCA 18
1 citation
Queensland Services, Industrial Union of Employees v Council of the City of Gold Coast [2023] QIRC 181
4 citations
R v A2 [2019] HCA 35
1 citation
R v A2 (2019) 269 CLR 507
2 citations
Thompson v Orica Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 116 IR 186
2 citations
Thomson v Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 939
1 citation

Cases Citing

No judgments on Queensland Judgments cite this judgment.

1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.