Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

Berry v Green[1999] QCA 213

 

COURT OF APPEAL

 

de JERSEY CJ

McMURDO P

DEMACK J

 

Appeal No 3984 of 1999

 

IAN BERRY Appellant

v

ROBIN HERROD GREEN Respondent

 

BRISBANE

 

DATE 07/06/99

 

JUDGMENT

 

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:  This is an application for the stay of a judgment given in the District Court for damages for professional negligence against a solicitor.  The solicitor's concern is that if the amount of the judgment is paid to the successful plaintiff, it will be irrecoverable in the event of success of the appeal.

We have been given figures which would suggest, for example, that had there been in the District Court a discounting of the prospects of success in the original action had it been brought by, say, 50 per cent, the amount of the judgment in favour of the successful plaintiff would have been nothing or virtually nothing.  There is debate about that, but it is sufficient for the moment to accept that that is an arguable position.

The plaintiff has some pressing financial commitments.  They include the costs of responding to the appeal, which on his solicitor's account would approximate $20,000.  There are in addition some $25,000 of commitments to a financier, apart from $15,000 said to be due to his son, although there is no suggestion that the son is pressing for payment.

So on one view the Court could stay execution on the judgment were approximately $45,000 paid over at this stage.  I have so approached the matter from the fundamental principle that a successful plaintiff is prima facie entitled to the fruits of his or her judgment, and that we must strive to avoid crafting a position in the Court of Appeal whereby judgments in the trial division, whether this Court or the District Court, are seen to be provisional only pending the result of an appeal.

The relevant approach as described by recent decisions of this Court is simply whether it is appropriate to grant a stay pending appeal.  There has been departure from the previous position which expressly required the demonstration of special or exceptional circumstances.  Of course it might be said the prescription of "appropriateness" as the test is rather unhelpful.  But it is plain that there must be some particular feature about the case which warrants departure from what I have referred to as the fundamental or prima facie position.

Mr Williams QC, who appears for the respondent, rightly points out that the position of this plaintiff would be little different, in broad terms anyway, from the position of most plaintiffs in claims for damages for personal injury, in that rarely would those persons have substantial financial resources; many of them would be dependent upon the payment of pensions and other Social Security benefits.

In the end, assessing the factors in this case, I identify no feature sufficient to warrant the conclusion that it is an appropriate case for a stay pending appeal.  I would therefore refuse the application.

THE PRESIDENT:  I agree that the application should be refused for the reasons given by the Chief Justice.

DEMACK J:  I also agree.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:  The application is refused.

MR WILLIAMS:  With costs, may it please the Court?

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:  With costs to be taxed.

MR WILLIAMS:  Thank you, Your Honour.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE:  Thank you.

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Berry v Green

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Berry v Green

  • MNC:

    [1999] QCA 213

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    de Jersey CJ, McMurdo P, Demack J

  • Date:

    07 Jun 1999

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

No judgments cited by this judgment.

Cases Citing

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
Alphadale Pty Ltd v Chief Executive, Department of Environment and Heritage Protection [2016] QLAC 62 citations
Avilake Pty Ltd v Tucker (No 2) [2012] QCATA 2611 citation
AZ v BY [2017] QDC 671 citation
Brett v Manson [2020] QCATA 1221 citation
Carrie v Department of Communities (Housing and Homelessness Services) [2010] QCATA 151 citation
Cook's Construction Pty Ltd v Stork Food Systems Aust Pty Ltd[2008] 2 Qd R 453; [2008] QCA 3226 citations
Cook's Constructions Pty Ltd v Stork Food Systems Aust Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 2202 citations
Creswick v Creswick [2011] QCA 662 citations
Crinis v Ray White Paradise Group [2016] QCATA 902 citations
Drew v Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] QCA 3122 citations
Edwards v Laraby Pty Ltd t/a Cruising Car Rental [2010] QCATA 51 citation
Fast Access Finance (Beaudesert) Pty Ltd and Anor v Charter and Anor [2011] QCATA 3332 citations
Goomboorian Transport Pty Ltd v Hanson (No 5) [2018] QSC 1941 citation
Gubier v Queensland Department of Housing and Public Works [2019] QCATA 42 citations
Jackson v Hammond Villages Pty Ltd t/as Hammond Village Gold Coast [2014] QCATA 22 citations
Jennings v Design and Procure Pty Ltd [2010] QCATA 362 citations
Kavanagh v Londy [No 2] [2022] QDC 2592 citations
King v TIC Realty (No 1) [2010] QCATA 752 citations
King v TIC Realty (No 2) [2010] QCATA 762 citations
Lindgren v Trigg [2011] QCATA 501 citation
Mackellar Mining Equipment Pty Ltd v Thornton (No 2) [2018] QSC 2082 citations
Masinello v Parker & Anor (No.1) [2013] QCATA 3242 citations
McCann Worldgroup Pty Ltd v Shingyun Pty Ltd [2018] QCATA 1281 citation
Pivavarova v Michelsen [2018] QCATA 11 citation
Queensland Health v Information Commissioner and Crutcher [2011] QCATA 661 citation
Queensland v Parer [2016] ICQ 132 citations
Russell and Russell v Chelbrooke Homes Pty Ltd [2011] QCATA 1832 citations
Seeiseo Pty Ltd v Body Corporate for Taralla Apartments CTS 15627 [2019] QCATA 701 citation
Skilton v 2PL Superannuation Pty Ltd [2019] QLC 452 citations
Skinner v FTP Contracting Pty. Ltd. & Anor [2019] QCATA 972 citations
Sommers v Bycroft [2019] QCATA 1302 citations
State of Queensland & Ralph v Bell [2015] QCATA 1722 citations
State of Queensland and Anor v Barney [2013] QCATA 82 citations
Taylor v Cox [2013] QCATA 2432 citations
Wechsel v Andrew [2011] QCATA 491 citation
Wright v Milne [2019] QCATA 532 citations
1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.