R v Hluszanska
[2000] QCA 125
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined (QCA)
- R v Hluszanska[2000] QCA 125
- Add to List
R v Hluszanska[2000] QCA 125
R v Hluszanska[2000] QCA 125
COURT OF APPEAL
de JERSEY CJ
DAVIES JA
THOMAS JA
[R v HLUSZANSKA]
CA No 371 of 1999
THE QUEEN
v.
SLAVA HLUSZANSKAApplicant
BRISBANE
DATE 10/04/2000
JUDGMENT
DAVIES JA: The appellant, Mrs Hluszanska, has sought to appeal to this Court against a judgment of the District Court given on 28 September last year, dismissing an appeal by her against a good behaviour order for 12 months ordered by a Magistrate against her for breach of section 6 of the Peace and Good Behaviour Act 1982.
She has come to this Court today seeking what she describes as a stay by which she appears to mean that she wants an adjournment of her appeal on medical grounds. There is, however, in my view, no point in granting any such adjournment. Any such appeal to this Court can be made only by leave of this Court.
When asked by the Chief Justice why she thought the order made by the District Court Judge was wrong Mrs Hluszanska advanced three reasons. The first was that the learned Judge did not have enough experience with the law. The second is that she said he protects criminal people and the third was that his Judgment was against the Australian constitution and when asked why she said that she repeated that he protects criminal people.
There is no substance in any of these grounds and as far as I can see there is no substance in any complaint of the judgment made by the District Court below. I would therefore refuse the adjournment which the appellant seeks or the stay as she describes it and I would dismiss the appeal to this Court.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: I agree.
THOMAS JA: I agree.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: Those are the orders which the Court makes.