Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

R v BM; Ex parte Attorney-General[2001] QCA 59

Reported at [2002] 1 Qd R 274

R v BM; Ex parte Attorney-General[2001] QCA 59

Reported at [2002] 1 Qd R 274
CITATION: R v BM; Ex parte Attorney-General [2001] QCA 59
JUDGE(S): McMurdo P, Williams JA, Mackenzie J
DELIVERED ON: 27 February 2001
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v BM; Ex parte Attorney-General

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v BM; Ex parte Attorney-General

  • Reported Citation:

    [2002] 1 Qd R 274

  • MNC:

    [2001] QCA 59

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    McMurdo P, Williams JA, Mackenzie J

  • Date:

    27 Feb 2001

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
QCA Original Jurisdiction[2001] QCA 59 [2002] 1 Qd R 27427 Feb 2001Question referred to the Court by the Attorney-General answered as follows: "In answer to the Attorney-General’s Reference Question: “Can specifying an alleged act as the first occasion when conduct of a certain type was committed be sufficiently particular to identify the offence charged” An accused person is entitled to be sufficiently apprised of the particular occasion referred to in a charge against him. When it is alleged that a series of acts of a similar character was committed, it is ne

Appeal Status

No Status

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.