Del Vecchio v Couchy
[2002] QCA 9
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)
- Del Vecchio v Couchy[2002] QCA 9
- Add to List
Del Vecchio v Couchy[2002] QCA 9
Del Vecchio v Couchy[2002] QCA 9
COURT OF APPEAL
de JERSEY CJ
McPHERSON JA
DOUGLAS J
CA No 245 of 2001
JEANNIE ANNE DEL VECCHIO
v.
MELISSA JANE COUCHY(Appellant)
BRISBANE
DATE 04/02/2002
JUDGMENT
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: On 7 December 2000 the applicant was convicted in the Magistrates Court of having used insulting words in a public place contrary to section 7, subsection (1) paragraph (d) of the Vagrants, Gaming and Other Offences Act 1931.
At about 4.00 a.m. on 21 September in Dickson Street, New Farm, the applicant, in an intoxicated and disoriented state, was approached by the complainant police officer who asked for her name and address. After initially ignoring the request the applicant said to the complainant police officer the words, "you fucking cunt" or to similar effect.
Having heard evidence and submissions, the Magistrate convicted the applicant and expressed comprehensive reasons for his conclusions. He sentenced her to three weeks' imprisonment, substantially, it seems, in view of her lengthy record and continued similar offending despite previous non-custodial penalties.
The applicant appealed to the District Court. Having served seven days of the three week term the applicant was, prior to the hearing of the appeal, released on a recognisance. The learned District Court Judge dismissed the appeal against conviction, but allowed the appeal against sentence, reducing the sentence to the time actually served, while indicating that he would have been inclined himself to order a community-based order, had he been in the position of the Magistrate.
The learned Judge likewise expressed comprehensive reasons for dismissing the appeal against conviction. The applicant now seeks leave to appeal, both in respect of conviction and sentence.
As to conviction, both the Magistrate and the District Court Judge applied the correct test, that is, what is objectively considered to be insulting in accordance with contemporary community expectations. The submission for the applicant was essentially, as I comprehend it, that what the applicant said should have been viewed as no more than uncouth, drunken ranting. But I believe that even allowing for modern licence, the community would generally still regard the use of the words "you fucking cunt" to a female police officer going about her duty, albeit by a drunken person in the early morning, as insulting.
In this case, it fell to the Magistrate to reach a view on contemporary community expectations, and to that exercise he may be taken to have brought to bear a wide experience of life, including substantial regular contact with many members of the community.
The test to be applied in these cases is clearly established and it was apparently applied. No sufficient reason has been advanced to warrant, by a grant of leave, this Court's facilitating a second appeal, and what would amount to a third hearing.
As to sentence, the maximum available penalty was six months' imprisonment. The applicant's past history justified more than a token penalty and there is no sufficient doubt as to the appropriateness of the course taken by the learned District Court Judge to warrant a grant of leave in respect of penalty alone.
The application should, in my view, be dismissed.
McPHERSON JA: I agree.
DOUGLAS J: I agree.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The application is dismissed.