Conway v Ketchup
[2003] QCA 228
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Conway v Ketchup[2003] QCA 228
- Add to List
Conway v Ketchup[2003] QCA 228
Conway v Ketchup[2003] QCA 228
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
PARTIES: | |
FILE NO/S: | |
Court of Appeal - Cairns Circuit | |
PROCEEDING: | General Civil Appeal |
ORIGINATING COURT: | |
DELIVERED EX | 26 May 2003 |
DELIVERED AT: | Cairns |
HEARING DATE: | 26 May 2003 |
JUDGES: | McMurdo P, Davies JA and Jones J |
ORDER: | Appeal dismissed |
CATCHWORDS: | LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - CONTRACTS, TORTS AND PERSONAL ACTIONS - THE PERIOD OF LIMITATION - ACTIONS TO RECOVER MONEY RECOVERABLE BY VIRTUE OF AN ENACTMENT - where respondent convicted of doing grievous bodily harm - where application for compensation pursuant to the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (Qld) filed outside limitation period - where appellant living in remote community - whether appellant's unawareness of ability to seek compensation was a "material factor of a decisive character" for the purposes of extending the limitation period LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - CONTRACTS, TORTS AND PERSONAL ACTIONS - THE PERIOD OF LIMITATION - ACTIONS TO RECOVER MONEY RECOVERABLE BY VIRTUE OF AN ENACTMENT - where appellant suffered serious injuries as a result of the attack - where appellant unaware of nervous shock suffered as a result of attack until after expiration of the limitation period - whether diagnosis of nervous shock was a "material factor of a decisive character" |
COUNSEL: | M Grant-Taylor SC, with A J Kimmins, for the appellant |
SOLICITORS: | Tony Bailey (Samford) for the appellant |
THE PRESIDENT: For the reasons given in Watson v Poynter [2003] QCA 224, Appeal No CA 9291 of 2002, in each of Lenoy v Seaton [2003] QCA 226, Appeal No CA 10847 of 2002, Lenoy v Smith [2003] QCA 225, Appeal No CA 10846 of 2002, and Conway v Ketchup [2003] QCA 228, Appeal No CA 9290 of 2002, the appeal is dismissed and applications for leave to appeal are refused.