R v Arnold
[2003] QCA 448
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined (QCA)
- R v Arnold[2003] QCA 448
- Add to List
R v Arnold[2003] QCA 448
R v Arnold[2003] QCA 448
COURT OF APPEAL
McPHERSON JA
MACKENZIE J
WILSON J
CA No 189 of 2003
THE QUEEN
v.
DAVID LYALL ARNOLD Appellant
BRISBANE
DATE 15/10/2003
JUDGMENT
APPLICANT conducted his own case
MR C W HEATON (instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland)) for the Crown
McPHERSON JA: Yes, well the Court has considered what you have said, and we are of the opinion that on the last occasion the Court considered, in detail, what was submitted by you in writing. The Court is also of opinion that constitutes a sufficient hearing and further, that if it matters, there was no application to have the matter heard orally as distinct from having the Court, as a matter of grace, consider the further written submissions, which you presented to the Court and which were considered in detail in paragraphs 11 and following of the reasons of the Court on the last occasion, that is, the reasons of this Court in hearing your initial appeal against conviction. Your appeal, or if it is an application, your application is dismissed, this Court having no jurisdiction to hear it. That is the order of the Court.