R v Hurst
[2006] QCA 75
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined (QCA)
- R v Hurst[2006] QCA 75
- Add to List
R v Hurst[2006] QCA 75
R v Hurst[2006] QCA 75
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: | R v Hurst [2006] QCA 75 |
PARTIES: | R v HURST, Nathan Stanley (applicant/appellant) |
FILE NO/S: | CA No 56 of 2006 DC No 1802 of 2004 |
DIVISION: | Court of Appeal |
PROCEEDING: | Sentence Application |
ORIGINATING COURT: | District Court at Brisbane |
DELIVERED EX |
|
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
HEARING DATE: | 17 March 2006 |
JUDGES: | McMurdo P, Fryberg and Douglas JJ Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, |
ORDER: | 1.Application for leave to appeal against sentence is granted 2.Appeal is allowed 3.Sentence of two months is set aside and sentence of thirteen days' imprisonment is imposed |
CATCHWORDS: | CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN GRANTED – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON – SEXUAL OFFENCES - where applicant convicted of one count of indecent treatment of child under 12 years – where applicant had touched ten-year-old girl outside her clothing on her pubic area but had immediately stopped – where it was held that incident fell at the lower end of seriousness for offences of this type – where applicant sentenced to six months' imprisonment suspended with an operational period of one year – where four months later applicant was convicted of driving under the influence of liquor during the operational period – where six months later applicant was dealt with for committing an offence during operational period of a suspended sentence and ordered to serve two months of six month suspended term of imprisonment – whether second judge should have extended operational period of suspended sentence rather than activating suspended sentence and imposing two months' imprisonment Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 9, s 147 R v Skinner; ex parte Attorney-General (Qld) [2001] 1 Qd R 322; [1999] QCA 521; CA No 307 of 1999, 17 December 1999, cited |
COUNSEL: | A W Moynihan for the applicant/appellant M J Copley for the respondent |
SOLICITORS: | Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant/appellant Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent |
THE PRESIDENT: At least the majority of the judges agree that the application for leave to appeal should be granted and the appeal allowed. Instead of ordering that the applicant serve two months of the suspended imprisonment, order instead that he serve 13 days imprisonment.
The Court will make that order today and we will publish our reasons later.