Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined (QCA)
- R v Clewes[2008] QCA 46
- Add to List
R v Clewes[2008] QCA 46
R v Clewes[2008] QCA 46
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
PARTIES: | |
FILE NO/S: | DC No 100 of 2007 |
Court of Appeal | |
PROCEEDING: | Appeal against Conviction and Sentence |
ORIGINATING COURT: | |
DELIVERED ON: | 7 March 2008 |
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
HEARING DATE: | 21 February 2008 |
JUDGES: | Keane and Holmes JJA and Mullins J Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made |
ORDERS: |
|
CATCHWORDS: | CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL –where appellant argues he was not given sufficient opportunity to present his account at trial – where appellant attempts to put a more favourable account of events on appeal CRIMINAL LAW – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – where appellant convicted of deprivation of liberty – where appellant restrained and confined wife in her unit – where appellant prevented wife from telephoning police CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – where appellant had a relevant criminal history – whether appellant’s sentence of 308 days for deprivation of liberty manifestly excessive |
COUNSEL: | The applicant/appellant appeared on his own behalf S G Bain for the respondent |
SOLICITORS: | The applicant/appellant appeared on his own behalf Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent |
[1] KEANE JA: I agree with the reasons of Holmes JA and with the orders proposed by her Honour.
[2] HOLMES JA: Mr Clewes appeals against conviction and sentence. After a trial on one count of assault occasioning bodily harm and one of deprivation of liberty, he was acquitted of the former and convicted of the latter. He did not articulate any recognisable grounds of appeal but complained that he was not given sufficient opportunity either in his police record of interview or at trial to present his account. No ground at all was specified in relation to the application for leave to appeal against sentence.
The appeal against conviction
[3] The complainant in relation to both counts was the appellant’s wife. She gave evidence that from about 10.00 pm on the evening of 21 December 2005 until about 9.00 am the following morning the appellant had restrained her and confined her in her unit. In particular, she said, every time she tried to use the telephone the appellant would take her arms and make her sit on the sofa and refused to allow her to use the telephone to ring the police. In the morning she had managed to get outside her unit but the appellant had pulled her back inside and said he would not let her go to the police.
[4] The appellant was interviewed by police officers on 22 December 2005. He said he had been endeavouring to persuade his wife to discuss any problems with him. At one stage she had bitten his finger and at another stage punched him. The police officer asked the question “Whereabouts did she punch you?”, in response to which the appellant gave the following answer which, in the part italicised below, contained his account of the incident in which his wife attempted to use the telephone:
“Oh several times, head, body. I thought if I stood there and let her hit me that she would get it out of her system, so I stood and just let her throw punches at me. She hit me several times in the head, body; yeah she must have hit me probably 15 - 20 times. Now this is sort of over a period of time as well. When I couldn’t take anymore I tried to wrap her up and just put my arms around the body. To do that we ended up, we tripped and fell back onto the bed, this time I’d followed her into the bedroom and this was actually taking place in the bedroom, so we fell back onto the bed and bed actually collapsed, the foot of the bed actually fell off. But all I was trying to do was to wrap her arms up to stop her from hitting. When I tried to stand back up again she kicked me with both legs into the stomach and rib area. It was quite painful and really took my breath away so I knocked her legs away. She then stood up and started hitting me again, so again I thought if I just stand and let her work the anger out that it’d be fine, so I stood and let her punch at me, again you can only take so much so I tried to wrap her up again to prevent her from hitting me. So much went on I was. At that stage I think she headed for the telephone and I said please Cora please sit and talk instead of doing something silly, sit and talk. So I was holding her in my arms and I said please come on please come and talk so I walked her over to the lounge chair and we sat down again, but I actually kneeled down in front of where she was sitting on the chair and I said something, I don’t know what, she didn’t like or something so she started to scratch at my face again, so I knocked her hands away from my face again. Then I think she decided that, all this time I was asking her to stop, calm down and talk. We had in the past made a decision that we weren’t to go to sleep on a problem, never go to sleep on a problem, never go to bed on a problem, sort it out before you go to bed, it’s an agreement we had and that’s what I wanted to do. She decided that she wanted to lay down and not answering so that was fine, so I was talking to her while she was laying on the lounge suite. She started to nod off to sleep so I shook her and said please sit up so I pulled her by the hands till she sat up. She at that stage I think she asked me to go home, I said please can we before I go can, can we keep talking until we’ve reached a resolution, until we’ve reached a solution to the problem. She just didn’t want to, she just won’t talk, when she’s knows she’s done something wrong she won’t talk to me. There was never any reason for her to accuse me of having affairs, it’s not that, there’s always something that I’ve done, like taking an extra hour at CHR or something, there’s always something underneath what she’s accusing me of, until you can find that out and address that problem it just keeps going on and on and on for days, weeks, it can last up to months. Eventually we were sitting there talking, by then it was morning. We had a shower, put the bed back together again, put the foot of the bed back on, had a shower. She tried to, I was bleeding quite profusely from the cut on my eye, she’d punched my eye several times and it just opened, opened, opened, each time she hit it, it was bleeding quite profusely. She tried to stop it from bleeding. She had some bruises on her body and I went and got a cloth and put some ice in it and gave it to her, she was attending her bruises as well as trying to stop the bleeding of my eye. It never at any time did I want to hurt Cora, all I wanted to do was to sit down, talk to her, find out what her problem was and solve it.”
Shortly after the police officer returned to the attempted telephone call:
“When she went for the phone, who do you think she was going to call?
She was going to call the Police.
She was going to call the Police, and how come you stopped her from doing that?
Because it was the wrong thing to do and I wanted her to talk, I just wanted to sit with her and talk the problem out.”
That line of questioning was resumed subsequently:
“To you, you feel as if getting the Police involved’s not the answer to the problem, what do you think Cora would have thought? You said she went to the phone and you thought she was going to call the Police. Do you not think that she would of wanted the Police there?
No, no it’s all a power thing. It’s a way to make me tow the line. It’s, look I’m struggling for words here.
Take your time.
It’s a very long and involved story. If you don’t know the past history it’s a long, long story that, it’s a way of punishing, calling the Police is a way of punishment. When she’s angry, when she’s depressed she has to hurt, physically and mentally and calling the Police is just another way of striking me.”
[5] The interview also canvassed the complainant’s attempt to leave the unit:
“Okay. Did at any time Cora run for the door or walk to the door and go outside?
Yeah she did.
She did? What was that incident about, what happened then?
Well then it was morning and she went outside. I went and grabbed her by the hand and said please come back inside and talk. So I led her back inside the house, closed the door and that was it.
Was there any reason why she would have gone outside?
I think she was trying to get one of the neighbours to call the Police or something.
Did she say this to you, or that’s just what you feel?
That’s just what I felt.
What made you feel that way?
She’s done it before you know.
And what did she do when you grabbed her hand to bring her back inside?
She came back inside.”
[6] The police officer later returned to the issue of the complainant’s freedom of action:
“Do you feel that she was free to use the phone when she wanted?
At the time that she wanted to no.
Do you feel that she was free to go outside when she wanted to?
If she’d have wanted to go outside for some reason apart from trying to attract attention to get the Police there. If she’d gone outside to water the plants or whatever it wasn’t a problem. I was trying to stop her from to stop this idea of getting the Police. All I wanted her to do was to sit with me and talk.
So all in all do you still think she was free to do whatever she was free to do whatever she wanted?
Yeah.
Even calling the Police?
No, no I did prevent her from calling the Police, but not by beating it
into her or something like that.”