Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined (QCA)
- Blundstone v Johnson[2010] QCA 258
- Add to List
Blundstone v Johnson[2010] QCA 258
Blundstone v Johnson[2010] QCA 258
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
PARTIES: | |
FILE NO/S: | DC No 2365 of 2009 |
Court of Appeal | |
PROCEEDING: | Application for Leave s 118 DCA (Civil) – Further Orders |
ORIGINATING COURT: | |
DELIVERED ON: | 24 September 2010 |
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
HEARING DATE: | Heard on the papers |
JUDGES: | Holmes and Chesterman JJA and Atkinson J Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders made |
ORDERS: |
|
CATCHWORDS: | APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND – POWERS OF COURT – COSTS – where applicants sought leave to appeal a decision extending a limitation period under the Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld) – where application for leave to appeal dismissed – where respondent applied for costs to be assessed on an indemnity basis – where respondent had made a Calderbank offer – where respondent’s application for indemnity costs based on arguments that the primary judgment was unremarkable and unanimously supported by the Court of Appeal; that the applicants failed to establish any different legal principle; that the applicants abandoned their primary appeal point; that the respondent’s claim was a modest one; that the applicants’ liability was accepted and only quantum was in issue; that there was no prejudice occasioned to the applicants by the respondent’s delay; and that the applicants were attempting to transfer their liability to professional indemnity insurer for the respondent’s solicitor – where respondent argued that the making of a Calderbank offer would not, of itself, justify an order for indemnity costs; that their application for leave was not wholly unmeritorious; that the application was not made for ulterior motives; and that the application was based on Court of Appeal authorities, which the Court distinguished – whether costs should be ordered on the standard or indemnity basis Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 (Qld), s 3(c), s 57(2)(b) Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225; [1993] FCA 536, cited Spencer v Nominal Defendant [2008] 2 Qd R 64; [2007] QCA 254, cited Tector v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd [2001] 2 Qd R 463; [2000] QCA 426, cited |
COUNSEL: | D B Fraser QC for the applicants W Campbell for the respondent |
SOLICITORS: | McInnes Wilson Lawyers for the applicants KM Splatt & Associates for the respondent |