To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council [2012] QCA 102
JUDGE(S):
Chesterman JA, M Wilson AJA, Philippides J
DELIVERED ON:
17 April 2012
Close
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
Shortened Case Name:
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
MNC:
[2012] QCA 102
Court:
QCA
Judge(s):
Chesterman JA, M Wilson AJA, Philippides J
Date:
17 Apr 2012
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2011] QPEC 54
06 Apr 2011
Three appeals from decisions of the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee finding that each of the three proposed premises in dispute were “Multi-unit dwelling” and not a “House” under the Brisbane City Plan 2000 (as amended). Appeals dismissed: R Jones DCJ.
QCA Interlocutory Judgment
[2012] QCA 102
17 Apr 2012
Ordered that the appellant pay one third of the respondent’s costs of the application for leave and the appeal on the standard basis: Chesterman JA, M Wilson AJA, Philippides J.