Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

Attorney-General v Wands[2019] QCA 125

Reported at (2019) 1 QR 365

Attorney-General v Wands[2019] QCA 125

Reported at (2019) 1 QR 365
CITATION: Attorney-General v Wands [2019] QCA 125
JUDGE(S): Sofronoff P, Morrison JA, Davis J
DELIVERED ON: 25 June 2019
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Attorney-General for the State of Queensland & Anor v Wands

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Attorney-General v Wands

  • Reported Citation:

    (2019) 1 QR 365

  • MNC:

    [2019] QCA 125

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Sofronoff P, Morrison JA, Davis J

  • Date:

    25 Jun 2019

  • Selected for Reporting:

    Editor's Note

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentDC73/18, DC190/18 (No citation)20 Sep 2018Mosely order made, upon adjournment of prerecording of complainant’s evidence and trial, staying further prosecution until Crown pays accused’s costs thrown away by adjournment in the sum of $2,400: Shanahan DCJ.
Primary JudgmentDC190/18 (No citation)19 Nov 2020Date of conviction; found guilty after trial before Richards DCJ and jury of one count of use electronic communication to procure, one count of possess child exploitation material, thirty-three counts of indecent treatment, and one count of use carriage service to access child pornography material; offences arose out of communications between accused, who was a schoolteacher, and 14yo schoolgirl in Scotland; sole issue at trial was defence of belief as to age; accused testified in own defence.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2019] QCA 125 (2019) 1 QR 365; (2019) 278 A Crim R 31925 Jun 2019A-G (Qld) and CDPP’s appeal against Mosely order allowed; order set aside; no basis upon which his Honour could have found that loss of $2,400 in context of present litigation led to any significant effect upon accused’s ability to fund his trial or to any unfairness in prosecution continuing: Sofronoff P, Morrison JA, Davis J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2021] QCA 23809 Nov 2021Appeal against convictions dismissed; prosecutor’s cross-examination of accused did not contravene EA s 15 in circumstances where the accused’s bad character was already before the jury, the questioning revealing nothing new/adding nothing; certain submissions in prosecutor’s closing address did not cause miscarriage of justice: Sofronoff P, Mullins JA, Crow J.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.