Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  •  Notable Unreported Decision
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

R v Rose[2021] QCA 262

CITATION: R v Rose [2021] QCA 262
JUDGE(S): Sofronoff P, Mullins JA, Daubney J
DELIVERED ON: 03 December 2021
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v Rose

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v Rose

  • MNC:

    [2021] QCA 262

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Sofronoff P, Mullins JA, Daubney J

  • Date:

    03 Dec 2021

  • White Star Case:

    Yes

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentDC524/19 (No citation)06 May 2021Date of conviction; convicted after trial (Reid DCJ and jury) of one count of rape; complainant a special witness for whom special arrangements under EA s 21A(2) made; consent and mistake as to consent in issue at trial; complainant gave evidence that she awoke to accused having sex with her; accused’s account in pretext phone call that complainant awake before sexual intercourse commenced.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2021] QCA 26203 Dec 2021Appeal allowed, conviction set aside, retrial ordered; trial judge erred in law in failing to direct jury in accordance with EA s 21A(8)(a); trial judge’s failure to give Liberato direction resulted in miscarriage of justice; combination of omissions meant that Crown could not discharge onus in respect of proviso; as not possible to conclude that not open to properly-instructed jury to find accused guilty, retrial should be ordered: Sofronoff P, Mullins JA, Daubney J.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.