PB v WorkCover Queensland
[2021] QCA 27
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- PB v WorkCover Queensland[2021] QCA 27
- Add to List
PB v WorkCover Queensland[2021] QCA 27
PB v WorkCover Queensland[2021] QCA 27
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: | PB v WorkCover Queensland [2021] QCA 27 |
PARTIES: | PB (applicant/appellant) v WORKCOVER QUEENSLAND ABN 40 577 162 756 (respondent) |
FILE NO/S: | Appeal No 4414 of 2020 QCATA No 137 of 2018 |
DIVISION: | Court of Appeal |
PROCEEDING: | Application for Leave Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act – Further Order |
ORIGINATING COURT: | Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal – [2020] QCATA 29 (Senior Member Brown and Member Browne) |
DELIVERED ON: | 23 February 2021 |
DELIVERED AT: | Brisbane |
HEARING DATE: | 11 August 2020 |
JUDGES: | Fraser and Philippides and McMurdo JJA |
ORDER: | No order for costs. |
CATCHWORDS: | PROCEDURE – CIVIL PROCEEDINGS IN STATE AND TERRITORY COURTS – COSTS – GENERAL MATTERS – GENERALLY – where the applicant was successful on appeal – where the applicant was self-represented – whether the applicant was entitled to recover costs |
COUNSEL: | The applicant/appellant appeared on his own behalf with CB assisting S A McLeod QC for the respondent |
SOLICITORS: | The applicant/appellant appeared on his own behalf with CB assisting Crown Law for the respondent |
- [1]FRASER JA: I agree with the reasons for judgment of McMurdo JA and the orders proposed by his Honour.
- [2]PHILIPPIDES JA: I agree.
- [3]McMURDO JA: This appeal succeeded to the extent that the appellant’s compensation, which the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal had ordered, was increased from $5,000 to $15,000.[1] The appellant failed on each of the grounds of appeal, which were identified in his application for leave to appeal. He was successful only on a point which he raised in his written argument.
- [4]He seeks his costs of the proceeding in this Court. The respondent submits that there should be no order for costs. The respondent’s submission should be accepted. Not only was the applicant unsuccessful on most of the matters which he argued, more importantly, he is an unrepresented litigant and he is not entitled to recover costs for his own time, or that of anyone else, which was spent in preparing and presenting his case.[2]
- [5]I would order that there be no order for costs in this proceeding.