Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

R v Amey[2022] QCA 69

CITATION: R v Amey [2022] QCA 69
JUDGE(S): Sofronoff P, McMurdo JA, Boddice J
DELIVERED ON: 10 May 2022
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v Amey

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v Amey

  • MNC:

    [2022] QCA 69

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Sofronoff P, McMurdo JA, Boddice J

  • Date:

    10 May 2022

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentSC351/21 (No citation)09 Jun 2021Date of conviction after trial (Bowskill J and jury) of possessing drugs and weapon found in bedrooms of house; counts 1-2 concerned things in bedroom 1; counts 3-4 related to bedroom 2, which was in same wing of house as bedroom 1; Crown case relied on, inter alia, personal effects belonging to accused in bedroom 2 and inference that occupier of bedroom 2 also occupied bedroom 1 (Drugs Misuse Act 1986 (Qld) s 129(1)(c)); defence case that accused had formerly occupied bedroom 2.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2022] QCA 6910 May 2022Appeal against convictions on counts 1-2 dismissed; contended that trial judge misdirected jury that it sufficed to find that accused occupied relevant wing of house; her Honour made it clear that jury should consider as a separate factual question whether accused occupied bedroom 1; summing-up could not be understood as suggesting that if accused occupied bedroom 2 it followed that he occupied bedroom 1: McMurdo JA (with whom Sofronoff P and Boddice J agreed).

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.