Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

R v SDR[2022] QCA 93

CITATION: R v SDR [2022] QCA 93
JUDGE(S): Fraser JA, Mullins JA, Boddice J
DELIVERED ON: 27 May 2022
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    R v SDR

  • Shortened Case Name:

    R v SDR

  • MNC:

    [2022] QCA 93

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Fraser JA, Mullins JA, Boddice J

  • Date:

    27 May 2022

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentDC885/21 (No citation)11 Jun 2021Date of sentence; head sentence of 10y (with automatic SVO declaration) for maintaining, two counts of rape and three of indecent dealing; 42-44yo babysitter regularly raped 9-10yo over 13m and then indecently touched her 9yo friend; timely pleas, no criminal history; prosecutor contended for 6-8y term with parole after one third; defence advanced 7-8y term; in submissions, comparables of 10y discussed and sentencing judge queried adequacy of range identified by parties (Clare SC DCJ).
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2022] QCA 9327 May 2022Leave to appeal sentence granted, appeal allowed, sentence varied to 9y with no order as to parole (per curiam); per Fraser and Mullins JJA (Boddice J not deciding), that the sentence was manifestly excessive; per Boddice J (Fraser and Mullins JJA contra), that the sentencing discretion miscarried because the sentencing judge failed to afford the offender procedural fairness in respect of the imposition of a sentence attracting an automatic SVO declaration.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.