Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
- Unreported Judgment
Thompson v Hall QCAT 337
Thompson v Hall  QCAT 337
Other minor civil dispute matters
On the papers
30 August 2016
Claim for possession of chattel – not a debt – possible action in possession or conversion – form of action not within QCAT’s jurisdiction
Ziegeler t/as Ziegco Pty Ltd v Recochem Incorporated  QCATA 78
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act).
REASONS FOR DECISION
- This application is about the true ownership of a chattel (the boat). It is not a debt, certainly not in the narrow vein/definition as stated in the QCAT Act.
- A debt in the Tribunal’s Minor Civil Dispute jurisdiction is a sum that can be calculated by reference to a schedule, yardstick or matrix (and that is not the case here) or as stated in Ziegeler t/as Ziegco Pty Ltd v Recochem Incorporated is one where the sum is determined and, in effect, beyond dispute as to how it is calculated. If the sum depends on assessment by the Court or Tribunal it is not liquidated. Rather, the applicant’s asserted cause of action appears to be in respect of unlawful possession of her property or an action for conversion i.e. wrongful appropriation to the respondent’s own use.
- There is no Minor Civil Dispute Tribunal jurisdiction to hear a claim of this nature. In these circumstances it is not necessary to address the request for decision by default, or the response or the application to strike out, all filed 24 August 2016.
  QCATA 78.
- Published Case Name:
Thompson v Hall
- Shortened Case Name:
Thompson v Hall
 QCAT 337
30 Aug 2016