Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

Carter t/as Hulk Constructions v Queensland Building and Construction Commission[2021] QCAT 181

Carter t/as Hulk Constructions v Queensland Building and Construction Commission[2021] QCAT 181

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

CITATION:

Carter t/as Hulk Constructions v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2021] QCAT 181

PARTIES:

JAMES NEIL CARTER T/AS HULK CONSTRUCTIONS 

(applicant)

 

v

 

QUEENSLAND BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

GAR329-19

MATTER TYPE:

General administrative review matters

DELIVERED ON:

14 May 2021

HEARING DATE:

On the papers

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Member Hughes

ORDERS:

The Tribunal confirms the decision of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission dated 21 March 2019 that a domestic building contract has been validly terminated, having the consequence of allowing a claim for non-completion under the statutory insurance scheme.

CATCHWORDS:

PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – BUILDERS – STATUTORY INSURANCE SCHEME – where review of decision that domestic building contract validly terminated – where applicant failed to adduce evidence – where Commission’s decision confirmed

Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), s 68I

Queensland Building and Construction Commission Regulation 2018 (Qld), Schedule 6

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 20

Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175

Body Corporate for Parkwood Villas v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2015] QCAT 59

Clarke v Cascade Pools (Qld) Pty Ltd [2010] QCAT 323

Cormack v Queensland Police Service – Weapons Licensing Unit [2015] QCATA 115

Creek v Raine & Horne Real Estate Mossman [2011] QCATA 226

Laidlaw v Queensland Building Services Authority [2010] QCAT 70

Walker v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2014] QCAT 228

APPEARANCES &

REPRESENTATION:

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld).

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. [1]
    The Queensland Building and Construction Commission paid out a claim of $13,250.00 to a home owner due to James Neil Carter trading as Hulk Constructions not obtaining building approval.[1]
  2. [2]
    Mr Carter applied to review the Commission’s decision that the home owner had validly terminated the contract. In a review application, the Tribunal’s purpose is to produce the ‘correct and preferable’ decision by way of a fresh hearing on the merits.[2] However, Mr Carter did not provide any evidence to assist the Tribunal to arrive at the correct and preferable decision.
  3. [3]
    Mr Carter has an evidential onus to provide material to support the decision he seeks.[3] This has also been described as a ‘practical onus’.[4] The Tribunal cannot make findings where the evidence is insufficient – parties must be responsible for preparing their own case.[5]
  4. [4]
    Without evidence and submissions to support Mr Carter’s review application, the Tribunal is unable to make the orders he seeks.[6] It is not open to the Tribunal to make a finding that the home owner did not validly terminate the contract.
  5. [5]
    The correct and preferable decision is to confirm the decision of the Commission dated 21 March 2019 that a domestic building contract has been validly terminated, having the consequence of allowing a claim for non-completion under the statutory insurance scheme.

Footnotes

[1] Contract dated 13 March 2018, Item 13, Clause 10, Clause 30; Statement of Carey William Humble dated 27 August 2020, [4], [5], [8], [9], [11], [13]; Council Certificate dated 28 August 2020; Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), s 68I; Queensland Building and Construction Regulation 2018 (Qld), Schedule 6.

[2] Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 20.

[3] Walker v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2014] QCAT 228, [23] citing with approval Laidlaw v Queensland Building Services Authority [2010] QCAT 70, [23].

[4] Cormack v Queensland Police Service – Weapons Licensing Unit [2015] QCATA 115, [33].

[5] Clarke v Cascade Pools (Qld) Pty Ltd [2010] QCAT 323, [3]; Creek v Raine & Horne Real Estate Mossman [2011] QCATA 226, [13], citing with approval Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175, 217.

[6] Laidlaw v Queensland Building Services Authority [2010] QCAT 70, [22] – [25]; Body Corporate for Parkwood Villas v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2015] QCAT 59, [67].

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Carter t/as Hulk Constructions v Queensland Building and Construction Commission

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Carter t/as Hulk Constructions v Queensland Building and Construction Commission

  • MNC:

    [2021] QCAT 181

  • Court:

    QCAT

  • Judge(s):

    Member Hughes

  • Date:

    14 May 2021

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175
2 citations
Body Corporate for Parkwood Villas Community Titles Scheme 25893 v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2015] QCAT 59
2 citations
Clarke v Cascade Pools (Qld) Pty Ltd [2010] QCAT 323
2 citations
Cormack v Queensland Police Service – Weapons Licensing Unit [2015] QCATA 115
2 citations
Creek v Raine & Horne Real Estate Mossman [2011] QCATA 226
2 citations
Laidlaw v Queensland Building Services Authority [2010] QCAT 70
3 citations
Walker v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2014] QCAT 228
2 citations

Cases Citing

No judgments on Queensland Judgments cite this judgment.

1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.