To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 5
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Daish v Body Corporate for Birchgrove CTS 100[2013] QCATA 13Dr J R Forbes and Member
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Daish v Body Corporate for Birchgrove CTS 100
Shortened Case Name:
Daish v Body Corporate for Birchgrove CTS 100
MNC:
[2013] QCATA 13
Court:
QCATA
Judge(s):
Dr J R Forbes, Member
Date:
26 Feb 2013
Appeal Status
Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.
