Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined (QCA)

Noffke v Oceanside Management Pty Ltd[2017] QCATA 6

Noffke v Oceanside Management Pty Ltd[2017] QCATA 6

CITATION:

Noffke v Oceanside Management Pty Ltd t/as Broadwater Apartments [2017] QCATA 6

PARTIES:

Allan Noffke

(Applicant/Appellant)

 

v

 

Oceanside Management Pty Ltd t/as Broadwater Apartments

(Respondent)

APPLICATION NUMBER:

APL305 -16

MATTER TYPE:

Appeals

HEARING DATE:

On the papers

HEARD AT:

Brisbane 

DECISION OF:

Senior Member Stilgoe OAM

DELIVERED ON:

17 January 2017

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

ORDERS MADE:

  1. Leave to appeal granted.
  2. Appeal dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL – LEAVE TO APPEAL – LANDLORD AND TENANT – RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES LEGISLATION – RECOVERY OF POSSESSION – where termination for excessive hardship – where application for compensation – where compensation ordered – whether grounds for leave to appeal

APPEAL – LEAVE TO APPEAL – QCAT – POWERS AND DUTIES – REASONS – PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS AND NATURAL JUSTICE – where application for compensation – where respondent submitted compensation not payable – where tribunal’s reasons did not address respondent’s submissions – where breach of natural justice – where error of law

Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321

Pickering v McArthur [2005] QCA 294

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (QCAT Act).

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. [1]
    Allan Noffke has suffered from severe health problems over the last couple of years which means he can no longer live in his rented home. His tenancy agreement was due to end on 12 December 2016 but, by notice dated 17 May 2016 to Oceanside Management Pty Ltd t/as Broadwater Apartments, he advised that he intended to terminate the tenancy on 9 June 2016.
  2. [2]
    On 8 June 2016, Mr Noffke applied to the tribunal for a termination of the tenancy agreement due to excessive hardship. The tribunal made that order on 20 June 2016, with the termination effective from 21 June 2016.
  3. [3]
    Broadwater Apartments then applied for part of the bond to be paid to it as compensation for early termination. The tribunal ordered that Mr Noffke pay $6 in unpaid rent, a break lease fee of $456 ($415 plus GST) and the filing fee of $63.20.
  4. [4]
    Mr Noffke wants to appeal that decision. Because this is an appeal from a decision of the tribunal in its minor civil disputes jurisdiction, leave is necessary.[1] Leave to appeal will usually be granted where there is a reasonable argument that the decision is attended by error, and an appeal is necessary to correct a substantial injustice to the applicant caused by that error.[2]
  5. [5]
    Mr Noffke says the tribunal failed to apply the relevant law. He says that the tenancy agreement was lawfully terminated under s 277 of Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2009 (Qld) (RTRA Act). He says that clause 7 of the tenancy agreement, which allows Broadwater Apartments to charge a break lease fee, does not apply because the tenancy agreement was lawfully terminated. He says, therefore, that Broadwater Apartments was not entitled to compensation.
  6. [6]
    Unfortunately, even though these matters were argued before the tribunal below,[3] the tribunal’s reasons are silent about the relationship between the tribunal’s order, s 277 and clause 7.
  7. [7]
    The tribunal should have addressed Mr Noffke’s submissions in its reasons. As Dr Forbes, a member of this tribunal has observed, there is a strong case for treating reasons for a decision as a necessary element of natural justice,[4] which is an error of law[5] for which leave to appeal should be granted.
  8. [8]
    Although leave to appeal should be granted, the appeal should be dismissed. Section 350(2) of the RTRA Act provides, specifically, that if the tribunal terminates a tenancy agreement because of excessive hardship, it may also make an order it considers appropriate, including an order that the a party pay compensation for the loss of tenancy. That section operates to negate Mr Noffke’s submission that no compensation was payable because the tenancy agreement was lawfully terminated.
  1. [9]
    The appeal should be dismissed.

Footnotes

[1]   QCAT Act, s 142(3)(a)(i).

[2] Pickering v McArthur [2005] QCA 294 at [3].

[3] Transcript page 1-8, lines 13 – 38.

[4] Justice in Tribunals (3rd Ed) (Federation Press, Sydney, 2010) at p 249 para 13.2.

[5] Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321.

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Allan Noffke v Oceanside Management Pty Ltd t/as Broadwater Apartments

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Noffke v Oceanside Management Pty Ltd

  • MNC:

    [2017] QCATA 6

  • Court:

    QCATA

  • Judge(s):

    Senior Member Stilgoe

  • Date:

    17 Jan 2017

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary JudgmentQCAT (No Citation)20 Jun 2016-
Primary Judgment[2017] QCATA 617 Jan 2017Appeal against order to pay fees for early termination of lease.
Notice of Appeal FiledFile Number: CA 1388/1714 Feb 2017Notice of Leave to Appeal filed.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2017] QCA 15621 Jul 2017Appeal against [2017] QCATA 6 allowed: Sofronoff P and Gotterson JA and Applegarth J.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined (QCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.