Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

Bickerton v Moulds[2001] QDC 312

DISTRICT COURT

Appeal No

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

JUDGE ROBERTSON

MATTHEW JOHN BICKERTON

Appellant

and

LINDA MICHELLE MOULDS

Respondent

MOUNT ISA

DATE 31/10/2001

JUDGMENT

HIS HONOUR: This is an appeal by Matthew James Bickerton. On 8 June 2001 he appeared in the Mount Isa Magistrates Court and pleaded guilty to one count of breach of the Bail Act, which was constituted by his failing to appear as required on 7 March 2001. He pleaded guilty to the offence and was represented before the Magistrate by Ms Trezise.

The submissions before the Magistrate were to the effect that he was 18 years of age, and although he had some criminal history, he had no prior convictions for failure to appear. Ms Trezise told the Magistrate that in her view the appellant needed to be assessed by a psychologist, and she placed material before the Magistrate to suggest that he was having some psychological difficulties.

The Magistrate correctly noted that the charges which were before the Cloncurry Magistrates Court were serious. However, in my opinion, his Worship did not give sufficient weight to section 9(2)(a) of the Penalties and Sentences Act in imposing a term of imprisonment wholly suspended for two years for his first breach of the Bail Act.

The Crown, represented by Mr Greggery on the appeal, properly concedes that a fine would have been sufficient to meet the requirements of the Act.

In those circumstances, the appeal is allowed. I set aside the orders made by the Magistrate, and in lieu I will order that the appellant be fined the sum of $150, to be paid on or before 31 December 2001, in default seven days' imprisonment.

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Bickerton v Moulds

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Bickerton v Moulds

  • MNC:

    [2001] QDC 312

  • Court:

    QDC

  • Judge(s):

    Robertson DCJ

  • Date:

    31 Oct 2001

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

No judgments cited by this judgment.

Cases Citing

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
JG v Clark [2008] QDC 2402 citations
1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.