Appleton v The Commissioner of Police
[2004] QDC 465
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Appleton v The Commissioner of Police[2004] QDC 465
- Add to List
Appleton v The Commissioner of Police[2004] QDC 465
Appleton v The Commissioner of Police[2004] QDC 465
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: | Appleton v The Commissioner of Police [2004] QDC 465 |
PARTIES: | JOHN ALAN APPLETON Appellant v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Respondent |
FILE NO: | 15 of 2002 |
DIVISION: | Civil |
PROCEEDING: | Appeal |
ORIGINATING COURT: | District Court, Ipswich |
DELIVERED ON: | 15 November 2004 |
DELIVERED AT: | Ipswich |
HEARING DATE: | 15 October 2004 |
JUDGE: | Richards DCJ |
ORDER: | Appeal dismissed |
CATCHWORDS: | Disqualified driving – on parole at the time – appropriate sentence |
COUNSEL: | Mr Lehane for the respondent |
SOLICITORS: | DPP for the respondent |
- [1]On 1 October 2002 John Appleton was convicted in the Ipswich Magistrates Court of disqualified driving, driving a vehicle that was unregistered and uninsured and was unlawfully obtaining registration plates. He then failed to supply his correct name and address to the police and was charged.
- [2]At the time of the sentence he was on parole for a District Court matter and was currently in custody. He was sentenced to three months imprisonment which was ordered to be served cumulatively to that District Court sentence.
FACTS
- [3]At 4.20 am on 20 July 2002 the police attended at Michael Street, Carole Park where they located the appellant in a motor vehicle on the roadway. Initially he gave police a false name, however, subsequently he told the police his correct name and details.
- [4]He had been disqualified previously in 1996 and 1997. As at 22 December 1999 he could have applied to obtain his licence back. He did not do so.
- [5]It was submitted on sentence that he was driving on the evening because he had to take his pregnant partner to hospital as she was experiencing difficulties. He travelled about three houses down the street in total. He did attempt to avoid detection. He pleaded guilty to the offences. It was submitted that the sentence was manifestly excessive and that the sentence should have been a wholly suspended term of imprisonment or a fine.
- [6]At the hearing of this appeal the appellant did not attend court and did not instruct solicitors to proceed with the appeal so the appeal was heard in his absence.
- [7]A significant factor in this matter is that the appellant has now served the three month sentence and this may be why he was uninterested in appearing at the appeal.
- [8]The appellant committed the offence whilst on parole. There is a need for general deterrence of the offence of driving whilst disqualified. This was not the only offence of which he was convicted on the day in question. In those circumstances, whilst it may be a high sentence, it cannot be said in my view that the sentence was manifestly excessive.
ORDER
The appeal is dismissed