De Candia v Holmes
[2005] QDC 297
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- De Candia v Holmes[2005] QDC 297
- Add to List
De Candia v Holmes[2005] QDC 297
De Candia v Holmes[2005] QDC 297
DISTRICT COURT | No 2170 of 2002 |
CIVIL JURISDICTION
JUDGE ROBIN QC
ANNABELLA DOUGALL DE CANDIA (ALSO KNOWN AS ANNABELLE CONNOLLY) | Plaintiff |
and
ELSIE JANE HOLMES (ALSO KNOWN AS JEAN HOLMES) | Defendant |
BRISBANE
..DATE 30/09/2005
JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR: As expected, there are no appearances today. Reasons were published to the parties on the 10th of August 2005, for the Court's conclusions, following a trial on 20th and 21st July.
Following the publication of those reasons, which can be found at [2005] QDC 242, Mr Myers, on behalf of the plaintiff, supplied further supplementary submissions on the 24th of August 2005, over and above the submissions referred to in paragraph 50 of the published reasons.
The communication, a copy of which went to the defendant's counsel, I will mark Exhibit 14 and place on the file.
ADMITTED AND MARKED “EXHIBIT 14”
HIS HONOUR: There is also on file a print out of email communications, passing from my associate to counsel for the parties.
Mr Myers' “Supplementary Submission in Response to Provisional Judgment” included in Exhibit 14 is, on the face of things, reasonable. There is no occasion, it seems to me, to look beyond that, given the defendant's lack of interest in challenging any part of it, notwithstanding advice that orders would be made as proposed by Mr Myers in those circumstances.
That being the case, the Court's order is that the plaintiff have judgment against the defendant for $24,687.87, together with costs on the top Magistrates Court scale.
-----