To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 8
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Delmenico v Brannelly & Ors[2007] QDC 199Forde DCJ
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Delmenico v Brannelly & Ors
Shortened Case Name:
Delmenico v Brannelly & Ors
MNC:
[2007] QDC 199
Judge(s):
Forde DCJ
Date:
31 Aug 2007
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2007] QDC 165
09 Aug 2007
Judgment of trial for damages for misleading and deceptive conduct under the ASIC Act and negligence arising from the giving of financial advice; lent sum of money upon security of promissory notes on recommendation, that ultimately failed and offered no return; judgment for the plaintiff: Forde DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QDC 199
31 Aug 2007
Costs reasons following judgment on 9 August 2007; defendants pay plaintiffs costs: Forde DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QDC 244
10 Oct 2007
Application for stay of enforcement of judgment pending appeal; the respondent’s financial position is such that if the judgment moneys are paid over to the respondent and the appeal is successful, the applicant will not be able to get it back; not an appropriate case for a stay to be granted: Koppenol DCJ.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2008] QCA 74
04 Apr 2008
Appeals dismissed with costs; appeal against successful claim for misleading and deceptive conduct under the ASIC act and negligence regarding the provision of financial advice; cross-appeal against cost order; no ground of appeal successful and no error in cost discretion: Keane and Fraser JJA and Chesterman J.
