Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

Sagigi v Woosup[2010] QDC 406

DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Sagigi v Woosup [2010] QDC 406

PARTIES:

STEVEN JOHN SAGIGI

(Applicant)

v

SANTINO SILAS WOOSUP

(Respondent)

FILE NO/S:

289 of 2009

DIVISION:

PROCEEDING:

Application for Criminal Compensation

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court, Cairns

DELIVERED ON:

29 October 2010

DELIVERED AT:

Cairns

HEARING DATE:

7 October 2010

JUDGE:

Everson DCJ

ORDER:

That the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $4,500.00.

CATCHWORDS:

Criminal compensation – physical injuries – psychological injuries

Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995

Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995

R v Jones ex parte Zaicov [2002] QdR 303 at 310

COUNSEL:

SOLICITORS:

Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant

No appearance for the respondent

  1. [1]
    This is an application for a compensation order pursuant to section 24 of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (“COVA”).
  1. [2]
    The injuries giving rise to the application were suffered as a result of a personal offence for which the respondent was convicted on indictment on 15 May 2008, namely assault occasioning bodily harm whilst armed.

Facts

  1. [3]
    In the early hours of 10 April 2007, in the course of a physical altercation the respondent produced a baseball bat, chased the applicant and struck him with it as he attempted to defend himself (“the incident”).

Injuries

  1. [4]
    The applicant suffered the following injuries as a consequence of the incident:
  • A fracture of the left ulna.

The relevant law

  1. [5]
    COVA establishes a scheme for the payment of compensation to the victims of certain indictable offences including those who suffer “injury” as defined in section 20, being “bodily injury, mental or nervous shock, pregnancy or any injury specified in the compensation table as prescribed under a regulation”.
  1. [6]
    Pursuant to section 25 of COVA, a compensation order may only be made up to the scheme maximum of $75,000 specified in section 2 of the Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 (“COVR”) using the percentages listed for an injury specified in the Compensation Table in SCHEDULE 1 of the COVA.  In R v Jones ex parte Zaicov[1] Holmes J described the process in the following terms:

“Thus, my examination of the section convinces me that a two or three stage process is entailed.  Where there is more than one injury, the first step is to arrive at the amounts in respect of each injury, the second is to add those amounts together, and the third, to arrive at the compensation order.”

  1. [7]
    Relevantly, the Compensation Table prescribes:
  • Item 15 Fracture/loss of use of arm/wrist (minor) … 4% - 10%
  1. [8]
    Section 25 of COVA also states that the court, in determining the amount that should be paid for an injury, “should have regard to everything relevant, including, for example, any behaviour of the applicant that directly or indirectly contributed to the injury”. Furthermore, the process of assessing compensation pursuant to COVA does not involve applying principles used to decide common law damages for personal injuries and the maximum amount of compensation provided for is reserved for the most serious cases, with the amounts provided in other cases intended to be scaled accordingly.[2]  If an injury is not specifically listed in the Compensation Table the court must decide the amount of compensation by comparing the injury or injuries to injuries listed in the Compensation Table and having regard to the amounts that may be ordered to be paid for these injuries.[3]

The assessment

  1. [9]
    The medical evidence before me discloses that the applicant was treated with a back slab and a fibre glass cast and apparently made an uneventful recovery.
  1. [10]
    A claim is also made for mental or nervous shock, however there is no evidence before me which justifies such a claim.[4]
  1. [11]
    I am satisfied that the applicant did not contribute to the injury.
  1. [12]
    Having regard to the evidence before me and in particular to the matters set out above, I assess compensation pursuant to COVA and the Compensation Table as follows:-
  • Item 31 – 6%    $4,500.00

Order

  1. [13]
    I order that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $4,500.00.

Footnotes

[1]  [2002] 2 QdR 303 at 310

[2]  s 25(8) referring to s 22(4)

[3]  s 25(6)

[4]  See RNC v NAC [2009] QSC 149 at [38]

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Sagigi v Woosup

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Sagigi v Woosup

  • MNC:

    [2010] QDC 406

  • Court:

    QDC

  • Judge(s):

    Everson DCJ

  • Date:

    29 Oct 2010

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
RMC v NAC[2010] 1 Qd R 395; [2009] QSC 149
1 citation
Zaicov & McKenna v Jones[2002] 2 Qd R 303; [2001] QCA 442
2 citations

Cases Citing

No judgments on Queensland Judgments cite this judgment.

1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.