To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 18
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Bell v Unimin Australia Pty Ltd (No5)[2013] QMC 7Lee G
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Bell v Unimin Australia Pty Ltd (No5)
Shortened Case Name:
Bell v Unimin Australia Pty Ltd (No5)
MNC:
[2013] QMC 7
Court:
QMC
Judge(s):
Lee G
Date:
28 Mar 2013
Appeal Status
Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
May v O'Sullivan
(1955) 92 CLR 658
2 citations
Re Clark, Bexton, Lane & Ors, Environmental Protection Agency
