Lewiac Pty Ltd & ING Real Estate Joondalup BV v Gold Coast City Council
[2002] QPEC 80
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 49
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Lewiac Pty Ltd & ING Real Estate Joondalup BV v Gold Coast City Council[2002] QPEC 80Newton DCJ
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Lewiac Pty Ltd & ING Real Estate Joondalup BV v Gold Coast City Council & Ors
Shortened Case Name:
Lewiac Pty Ltd & ING Real Estate Joondalup BV v Gold Coast City Council
MNC:
[2002] QPEC 80
Court:
QPEC
Judge(s):
Newton DCJ
Date:
20 Dec 2002
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2002] QPEC 59
07 Jun 2002
Fourth and seventh co-respondents and respondent each applied for further and better disclosure from appellants concerning Harbour Town Shopping Centre; whether requested documents directly relevant to matters in issue; applications allowed in part: Newton DCJ
Primary Judgment
[2002] QPEC 58 [2003] 1 QPELR 151
07 Jun 2002
Fourth co-respondent applied for determination of jurisdictional validity of appellants' appeal against respondent council's deemed refusal of application for development permit; application dismissed and declared that appellant's development application validly made: Newton DCJ
Primary Judgment
[2002] QPEC 80 [2003] QPELR 385
20 Dec 2002
Appellants appealed against deemed refusal by respondent council to approve development application for material change of use at Harbour Town Shopping Centre; whether sufficient planning need demonstrated for proposed development; appeal dismissed: Newton DCJ
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2003] QCA 141
25 Mar 2003
Appellants applied for leave to appeal against [2002] QPEC 80; where judge found proposed development would exceed level and role of centre within town planning hierarchy; whether judge made errors of law; application refused: de Jersey CJ, Williams JA and Atkinson J
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
Cain & Anor v Pine Rivers Shire Council
(1975) 33 LGRA 150
3 citations
Comiskey v Pine Rivers Shire Council
(1996) QPELR 158
3 citations
Council v Secretary of State for the Environment & Anor
(1986) 53 Property Planning and Compensation Reports 55
2 citations
Cut Price Stores Retailers Ltd v Caboolture Shire Council
(1984) QPLR 126
2 citations
Indooroopilly Golf Club v Brisbane City Council
(1982) Q.P.L.R 13
2 citations
Intrafield Pty Ltd v Redland Shire Council
(2000) QPELR 337
2 citations
Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Kantidis (sic)
(1978) 140 CLR 675
2 citations
Lewiac Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Gold Coast
