To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 17
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)
Lamb v Brisbane City Council[2006] QPEC 124Brabazon DCJ
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Lamb v Brisbane City Council & Anor
Shortened Case Name:
Lamb v Brisbane City Council
MNC:
[2006] QPEC 124
Court:
QPEC
Judge(s):
Brabazon DCJ
Date:
14 Dec 2006
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2006] QPEC 124
14 Dec 2006
Application for a declaration that the Highgate Hill property listing in the Heritage Register pursuant to the Heritage Register Planning Scheme Policy is invalid; the Policy purported to "regulate development on, or the use of", the premises, and is accordingly invalid (s 2.1.23(4) IPA): Brabazon QC DCJ.
Application for leave granted and appeal allowed; dismiss application to the P&E Court that the inclusion of the Highgate Hill property on the Heritage Register was invalid; the HRPS Policy did not purport to regulate development on, or the use of, premises (s 2.1.23(4) IPA): Keane and Holmes JJA and Wilson J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2008] QCA 109
09 May 2008
Application for indemnity certificate for [2007] QCA 149 refused; no proper explanation for delay in bringing the application and question of law the subject of the appeal was not one of particular difficulty: Keane and Holmes JJA and Wilson J (Wilson J dissenting).
Special Leave Refused (HCA)
[2007] HCATrans 589
04 Oct 2007
Special leave refused; not convinced that the applicant would have reasonable prospects of demonstrating error in the processes of statutory construction which the Court of Appeal applied to the complex State legislation involved in this case: Kirby and Heydon JJ.
