To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 14
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Krajniw v Brisbane City Council[2008] QPEC 48Wilson DCJ
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Krajniw & Ors v Brisbane City Council & Anor
Shortened Case Name:
Krajniw v Brisbane City Council
MNC:
[2008] QPEC 48
Court:
QPEC
Judge(s):
Wilson DCJ
Date:
06 Aug 2008
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2008] QPEC 48 [2009] QPELR 83
06 Aug 2008
Proposal shows planning merit, achieves goals in planning scheme, meets proven need for golf course and will deliver a net gain in biodiversity without any unacceptable impacts; appeal dismissed: Wilson SC DCJ
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2009] QCA 76
03 Apr 2009
No arguable error made; application for leave to appeal dismissed: McMurdo P, Holmes and Chesterman JJA
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
Parmac Investments Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
