To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 34
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Moon v Gold Coast City Council[2010] QPEC 26Wall DCJ
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Moon & Littleford v Gold Coast City Council
Shortened Case Name:
Moon v Gold Coast City Council
MNC:
[2010] QPEC 26
Court:
QPEC
Judge(s):
Wall DCJ
Date:
19 Mar 2010
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2009] QPEC 3
27 Feb 2009
The Gold Coast City Council granted development approvals of certain land. Dr Moon and Mr Littleford appealed those decisions seeking a declaration that the developments were not valid schemes and orders setting aside the decisions. Applications dismissed: Kingham DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2009] QPEC 7
13 Mar 2009
Dr Moon and Mr Littleford applied for leave to withdraw their abandonment of an application for the Court to declare that the actions of the co-respondent National Trust of Queensland in consenting to the subject development applications being made, were ultra vires. Application dismissed: Kingham DCJ.
Primary Judgment
[2010] QPEC 26
19 Mar 2010
The respondent, Gold Coast City Council, and the first co-respondent, National Trust of Queensland, applied for orders that the appellants pay all or some of their costs of resisting these appeals, which were ultimately discontinued. Appellants ordered to pay respondents' costs: Wall QC DCJ.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2013] QCA 4
01 Feb 2013
Mr Littleford and Dr Moon applied for leave to appeal against orders made in the Planning & Environment Court directing that costs ordered against each of them be assessed by a court appointed costs assessor. Each also applied for an extension of time for filing the application for leave to appeal. Applications dismissed: Fraser JA, White JA, Douglas J.
