To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 14
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council[2011] QPEC 54Jones DCJ
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
Shortened Case Name:
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
MNC:
[2011] QPEC 54
Court:
QPEC
Judge(s):
Jones DCJ
Date:
06 Apr 2011
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2011] QPEC 54
06 Apr 2011
Three appeals from decisions of the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee finding that each of the three proposed premises in dispute were “Multi-unit dwelling” and not a “House” under the Brisbane City Plan 2000 (as amended). Appeals dismissed: R Jones DCJ.
QCA Interlocutory Judgment
[2012] QCA 102
17 Apr 2012
Ordered that the appellant pay one third of the respondent’s costs of the application for leave and the appeal on the standard basis: Chesterman JA, M Wilson AJA, Philippides J.
