To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
Shortened Case Name:
AAD Design Pty Ltd v Brisbane City Council
MNC:
[2011] QPEC 54
Court:
QPEC
Judge(s):
Jones DCJ
Date:
06 Apr 2011
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2011] QPEC 54
06 Apr 2011
Three appeals from decisions of the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee finding that each of the three proposed premises in dispute were “Multi-unit dwelling” and not a “House” under the Brisbane City Plan 2000 (as amended). Appeals dismissed: R Jones DCJ.
QCA Interlocutory Judgment
[2012] QCA 102
17 Apr 2012
Ordered that the appellant pay one third of the respondent’s costs of the application for leave and the appeal on the standard basis: Chesterman JA, M Wilson AJA, Philippides J.